1,413 karma · joined January 29, 2023
You make it sound like they stole it but they legally bought it and are building the new nuclear plants in collaboration with Westinghouse.
Impressive.
A group of Russian trolls/comedians have been able to cheat Western politicians and journalists into talking with them using deep faked webcam feeds and edited documents.
Most still remember the amount of ridiculous "anonymous source" bullshit stories that were pushed during the Trump years.
Honestly at this point I just assume all "anonymous sources" and the journalists who quote them are lying.
But GPT-4 is indeed a class of its own.
They are worse than GPT-4 because nobody other than OpenAI (and their free Azure credits) have been willing to throw $100 million in training a single LLM.
>Microsoft owned 49% of the for-profit part of OpenAI.
>OpenAI's training, inference, and all other infrastructure were running entirely on Azure credits.
>Microsoft/Azure were the only ones offering OpenAI's models/APIs with a business-friendly SLA, uptime/stability, and the option to host them in Azure data centers outside the US.
OpenAI is already Microsoft.
What would be the economic and geopolitical consequences of the US breaking up the only US companies that are globally competitive? Chinese giants will outcompete the smaller less competitive remnants after these kind of corporate breakups.
But it was also this bad before Musk.
I know that AWS made a blatant hosted version of Elasticsearch without contributing back but the other examples are less damning.
Azure's MongoDB offering is just the MongoDB API on top of their own document-oriented storage and querying architecture. Their globally scalable Redis offering is most likely also their own implementation and only using the same API as Redis.
The board was irresponsible and incompetent by design. There is one OpenAI board member who has an art degree and is part of some kind of cultish "singularity" spiritual/neo-religious thing. That individual has also never had a real job and is on the board of several other non-profits.
He is not anti mil-tech.
There is nothing business-y about this. As a non-profit OpenAI can do whatever they want.
When things cool down in a few months we will learn Altman and Brockman were some of the few sane people on the board.
What the hell were they thinking? Just because you are a non-profit doesn't mean you should imitate other non-profits and put crazies on the board.
A Star of David emoji is not the same thing as an Israeli flag emoji.