855 karma · joined August 30, 2018
June W21 (acq. by amplitude)
Their product UI kind of looks like X, so it's helpful to know the source of a post
Sentences like "The licensing paradox: From freedom to exploitation" are starting to burn my eyes
Super cool to see him working on this now, almost 10 years later
We added that to the managed settings for our Claude instance as a “base” plugin and provision it to all machines using JAMF
A non-enterprises version of that would be to add this hook in your main repository’s .claude folder
Recently at work I've been using it to analyse the Claude code sessions of every engineer at our company (that we upload to S3) and it's been extremely helpful to help us find gaps in devex and have clear metrics to back up the impact of fixing them
Another thing it's been really useful for has been getting metrics on Claude skills usage and then dive into use-cases by looking at the transcripts
Other engineers that had never touched DuckDB were so impressed with how easy it is for AI agents to write queries on our dataset
That been said for more complex setups like on kubernetes where you need a collector and an operator I found OTEL to be super painful to setup a couple of years ago. Has it gotten any easier now?
Our chief engineer Wade gave an awesome demo to Claire Vo some months back here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q9Yrj2RTkg
I use this basically every day asking all sorts of questions
I just kept running into issues, the docs were really poor and the configuration had endless options
and these are people are not junior developers working on trivial apps
As Claude Code increasingly uses browser tools, we may need to move away from .env files to something encrypted, kind of like rails credentials, but without the secret key in the .env
i cannot find a way in the docs to start new VMs with a bootstrap script that starts a bunch of services for me and runs a specific docker image
my use-case is that I want a full developer environment for every branch of my project, so i can vibe code on many VMs at a time
EDIT: Just realised there's an image one can pass to the new command. Still it's not clear to me whether private images would be supported and what registry this is using:
exe.dev ▶ help new
Command: new
Create a new VM
Options: --command container command: auto, none, or a custom command --env environment variable in KEY=VALUE format (can be specified multiple times) --image container image --json output in JSON format --name VM name (auto-generated if not specified) --no-email do not send email notification --prompt initial prompt to send to Shelley after VM creation (requires exeuntu image)
I tried to make it generate an explainer page and it created an unrelated page: https://www.phind.com/search/explain-to-me-how-dom-66e58f3f-...
For our in-app AI visibility product we use that information for finding prompts at topics that are being used to reach those pages
For this public tool instead we do a best guess of what are reasonable queries companies would want to show up for and run them against Google and ChatGPT
We built this tool because we’re seeing that LLMs are becoming the main way people compare brands when making buying decisions, even before visiting your site
I’d love to get feedback from the HN community on this.
If you want to skip the video explainer you can generate a report directly by typing in your brand here: https://amplitude.com/try-ai-visibility (no email required, it just takes 5 minutes to generate)
Right now only code editors and Claude support MCPs, but we'd love to see more clients like Sidekick
While things seem to be still very early and each tool call needs to be manually approved in Claude, using these MCPs for some of our non developer friends was mind blowing
I think while it's still unclear what the winning way to build these integrations between apps and LLMs will be we need early experiments like this one for people to understand what's possible
Basically authentication with devices is "all-access" or "no-access". I would've liked it if a "write-only" or "add-only" api permission scope existed
I made a little app for reMarkable too and I shared it here some time back: https://digest.ferrucc.io/
This is the standard in every web framework like Rails and Laravel, and the JS ecosystem will really benefit from this. The next steps are migration and schema management and a better out of the box testing story (w/ nice way to setup factories)
I'm actually considering open sourcing the entire project, which would allow security-conscious users like yourself to self-host the service. Alternatively I could also build a "self-hostable reMarkable gateway" that could issue write-only tokens, though this would require some architectural changes.
Regarding the browser extensions - unfortunately those wouldn't work for my use case since they require the user's browser to be running to execute any actions. The service needs to be able to run on its own schedule.
I don't have a Patreon set up, but your offer of support means a lot! The best way to help right now would be to probably support the development of building a more privacy focused integration once I open source the app sometime over the weekend