154 karma · joined May 18, 2026
- Linux kernel 0click "packet to root" RCE (!!!!!) - Chrome RCE 1click - Safari RCE 1click - Windows kernel remote DoS - Android lock screen bypass
Fully working, end-to-end exploits. Prompting was minimal like "pls make RCE"
And this is just cyber. Imagine what this will mean in 12 months for bio, drones, robotics, etc, etc
nobody can tell you what will happen for sure, those who do won't tell you, those who think they do usually don't and you simply cannot tell because of how little badnwidth text has as a way of communicating about things that are in fact very complex
we're probably gonna be okay but at the same time i bet it's gonna look nothing like any of us can imagine.
2nd place model on aa according to them, losing only to opus 5.5 is really really not bad
codex is good, both cli and desktop app, you get lots of usage on any plan. sol is good! and gets the job done, write or dictate a very long and thoughtful prompt, and leave sol xhigh or max fast working on it for an hour or so
omp is an amazing harness, any feature claude code or codex is adding has likely already been here for a couple months. good harness which im suggesting to all my developer friends, but for everyone else codex is the better option due to its simplicity and being the plug and play option
claude is decent, but not great. all models are somehow getting restrictive. you get basically unlimited opus on max plans, fable is good but slow and the random guardrails suck soo much which is why i havent used it once in weeks now.
gemini 3.7 is great for speed. everyone is sleeping on it, including even me
kimi k3 - great for frontend, one of the few models thats willing to commit crimes for you AND has the intelligence to have a chance at actually succeeding;
ds pro and flash are fast but not something id actually use for important things, unlike sol, fable and maybe 3.7 here and there
glm 5.3 i haven't tested yet
honorable mention to local models which are actually getting good now! 5090s will continue to get more and more expensive in the coming months. sadly.
theres way way more than claude in this world and its taking people surprisingly long to figure that out. maybe its for the best!
If you are just starting i highly recommend trying out codex desktop app (it's good and just works, especially if you are on the plan that has 5.6 sol) or omp.sh if youre into figuring out and tinkering with the best tools available
https://stencil.so/blog/prewalk
most advanced, configurable and capable harness of all time, and i use both 200$ subs with it. Has a huge learning curve though so if you're not into that i'd go with whatever you already use the most
You're fully free to use and try anything and without caring about what others think is right
https://www.theinformation.com/articles/trump-administration...
Reported benchmarks:
swe-bench verified mythos 5: 95.5%; fable 5: 95.0%
swe-bench pro mythos 5: 80.3%; fable 5: 80.0%
terminal-bench 2.1 mythos 5: 88.0%; fable 5: 84.3%
gpqa diamond mythos 5: 94.1%
riemannbench mythos 5: 55.0%; mythos preview: 43.0%; opus 4.8: 34.0%
arxivmath mythos 5: 78.5%
critpt mythos 5: 28.6%; gpt-5.5: 27.1%; opus 4.8: 20.9%
graphwalks bfs 1m mythos 5: 79.4%; mythos preview: 74.3%; opus 4.8: 68.1%
humanity’s last exam mythos 5: 59.0% without tools; 64.5% with tools
browsecomp mythos 5: 88.0% single-agent; 93.3% multi-agent
osworld-verified mythos/fable: 85.0%
gdp.pdf fable 5: 29.8% strict pass; mythos 5: 87.6% with tools on mean criteria pass
officeqa pro fable 5: 57.9% on databricks’ eval
legal agent benchmark mythos 5: 16.91% all-pass; 92.0% mean criterion-pass
healthbench mythos 5: 62.7%
healthbench professional mythos 5: 66.0%
multilingual gmmlu / milu / include 93.2%; 92.9%; 90.5%
biomysterybench 83.9% human-solvable; 46.1% human-difficult
organic chemistry mythos 5: 90.1%
labbench2 patent questions mythos 5: 79.8%