3,234 karma · joined February 3, 2012
How is Keybase planning on making money?
Project Zero (whether it's housed at Google or not) has a vested interest in making their detections as newsworthy as possible. Apple has a vested interest in downplaying those claims as much as possible.
"No, I don't have a Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram account, but I do have an account on this site called Hacker News."
"Oh, so are you a hacker?"
Good luck.
It might be worth reconsidering that viewpoint. As you say, we're good at hate. We've been good at it, too.
We've seen that something as simple as preferring male children to female children has dramatic societal consequences. It might be reasonable to decide you want to bias your child against being left-handed — lefties do have higher rates of accidents due to using right-handed tools after all. What might the societal shifts be as a result? Might we effectively loose some diversity of _thought_ and progress in our society at large? How might remaining lefties be perceived?
He may go down in history, but he will appear in the ethics chapter alongside Dr. Rascher and will not be lauded.
> To clarify, several cancers can be caused by infectious entities; cervical cancer, for example, is the work of HPV, a sexually transmitted virus. But in those cases, the cancer itself is not infectious and cannot spread. CTVT is different: Each cancer cell is a free-living parasite that can set up another tumor on another dog.
Put another way, HPV is a virus whose effects can cause cancer. That is, it causes mutations in _your own_ cells that cause them to become cancerous.
CTVT is essentially a parasitic cell line — not your cells hopping a ride on you.
Does anyone have any insight into how this attack works? My guess is that it acts like a hub that exposes both the iPhone lightning connector and a keyboard/mouse. And then the keyboard/mouse is controllable via some near-range wireless like WiFi or bluetooth? I suppose it could even scan for open networks and try to join to allow a more remote exploit. Anyone find more information anywhere?
That said, the error bars are simply too large to do anything reasonable for dates prior to 1955. The difference between 80 years and 110 years is 98.7% vs. 99.0% of the original C14 concentration... and while you may be able to get a very precise measurement of the remaining C14 you also need to very precisely know the baseline from that era to determine the percentage. Thus typical radiocarbon error bars are at least ±60 years.
https://petapixel.com/2016/02/09/this-teardown-of-a-sony-e-m... (blog bait summary — but with a bit more text)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9umAQ1-an4 (the actual video)