4ugSWklu

If you read very carefully, you'll see that the word "more" is key in that sentence.

You sir have just won the internet!

I hope that someone gets a photo of Crump’s Mouse one day.

Did it catch them baconing? If so, at what time?

(ง ͠° ͜ʖ ͡°)ง

Not great. Very few chippies.

Why is that disappointing? Are charities and NHS trusts that help trans people above the law?

You can get iodised salt in Norway in basically any grocery store. Look for “salt med jod”.

I think in a perfect world that would be great. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to see how a system like that could ever be implemented within our lifetimes.

I personally think Baseline is a good pragmatic approach. It includes only known media, where they retain the originals for sense checking, and only includes things judged to be CSAM by trained experts. It’s probably the lightest touch possible solution that is still somewhat effective.

I’m unsure what you’re saying here, can you clarify?

Is it that Baseline seems overly bureaucratic and will be ineffective, or that people should not support any CSAM lists at all?

“To be included in the Baseline list, child abuse images and videos must be recognized as such by our specialist network of investigators, and meet specific criteria in terms of the severity of the image content, for example those believed to feature children aged 13 and under.

The strict criteria ensure that the Baseline list refers only to images and videos which would be considered as illegal in any country.”

INTERPOL has a very large membership, including Russia and China. The baseline list is reviewed so only media that is illegal in every country INTERPOL operates in is included.

I’m not sure how a veto system as you’re suggesting would work practically, but this might be the closest thing.

This does already exist somewhat as the INTERPOL Baseline list - https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Crimes-against-children/Bloc...

Does this meet your threshold?