5h

I'm guessing it looks for sudden adjustments to stay in lane after micro-sleeps.

Happy to ride my anecdotal evidence all the way to the bank.

Are you asking enough, or good enough questions before accepting offers? For the right company be up-front about your reason for leaving, as long as both parties know the role is sufficiently rewarding I doubt you would be classed a flight risk.

Did you mean "couldn't care less"?

> Did I summarize it well?

no

> You know when you see Linus piss on security so easily, you start to wonder - maybe that joke about allowing the NSA backdoor in the kernel was actually true?

Are you referring to the article you didn't read here?

Actual takeaway:

> "The only real solution to security is to admit that bugs happen," Torvalds said, "and then mitigate them by having multiple layers, so if you have a hole in one component, the next layer will catch the issue."

I think the reset process requires postcode & DOB (in the UK anyway) which would high a good probability of being available in the data-dump type scenario.

Visa 3d secure is popular now though.

^ fixed link

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=world+population+1900+t...

I'm finding it incredibly fun - being be effective on both sides - I really do feel it is a false dichotomy.

parent records will be repeated intelligently for nested sub-records.

At my a new gig I've just avoided having to write add 'just one more report' to the fragile homebrew report designer by letting people pull out structured data and make their own reports. Code required was trivial & the risk was super low as we could just use existing API methods to get the XML out.

This has caught my eye though, so I'll have a tinker in the morning.

Talking of context though, I think any individual is capable of thinking for themselves when it comes to how much water a day to drink.

Well, that's the best thing I've read all day.

edit: i should have been clearer, osmand isn't just "good enough" - it is brilliant.

Just because you have skills in one field, don't assume they transfer to another.

Those "doodads" have been through a metric fuck-tonne of windtunnel testing & modelling.

I always enter some variation of "nobody-likes-popups@digitaltrends.com" with the domain changed to suit in the vain hope it tips the balance in a discussion someday.

A crap gif and half a paragraph add nothing to the video imho.

Any given team has information flowing between members (be it business or technical knowledge) - some members give out more information than they consume - they are usually the senior ones.

Props for replying - communicating in the face of adversity isn't fun I know, so thank you for that!

I'll try to put my thoughts together in an email for you, but just incase I don't get around to it here's a seat-of-my-pants synopsis before I get into work.

Make the back-to-article functionality discoverable, tell your uses they need to hover over the article / press c / whatever to close the ad, tell people the content is over ----> there.

Techie audiences like here are more likely to not have their hands on a mouse, If I have to take my hands off the keyboard to click on the ad it's annoying also.

Think of you power users, I open a bunch of tabs then flick through them a bit later - This meant I missed the transition where it goes off to one side. I thought your website was a pop-under type exploit - not so hot! use the windows focus & blur events to activate your ad

Seeing the article for a second, then watching it fuck-off to never-never land is really annoying, It's like someone switching the TV off just after kick-off in a game of football.