Aethylia

I haven't tried that yet but I'll give both a try, thank you. I'm not giving up on it yet. Good to know they're responsive, I might look at fixing it myself.

Yes that's correct, but I think it appears everytime with a refresh.

Completely agreed on avoid Tampermonkey, but Violentmonkey fails to detect the page on one of my scripts very often. If I refresh it works. This is a match with no wildcards and just a simple path after the URL.

Perhaps a simple bug, but doesn't give me much faith in the project.

The same often goes for security without the .txt too.

Congratulations! Really good to hear, and definitely a nudge to me to let people know when their blog was useful.

I'm not sure this is true. In my experience a lot of people actually do think that it's case sensitive. Many times I've heard someone describe the capitals while verbally telling someone their addresss.

However it being insensitive has probably helped a lot of times where people make mistakes in explaining or copying those capitals.

By maps to, they mean it counts as the same email address. 111@ and lll@ do not do that. The font has no impact on the email spec. However it can add extra confusion.

This doesn't really make any sense. It's not just gmail that does this, dots are almost always ignored before the @.

Nobody else can register an email that is the same as yours but without a dot. So the only way you receive someone else's email is if they give the wrong address.

It is true and it's not just gmail, dots before the @ are ignored.

I think it looks beautiful, but have to echo the comments about not having the home, end, pgup, pgdown + numpad keys making it impractical. Would 100% get this if it had a full sized version.

You could change the option of where to save downloads. Instead of automatically putting them in the downloads folder, if you change it to ask every time, then you will get the file browser prompt before the download starts.

I feel like once I noticed usenix is an anagram of unisex, I can't stop reading it that way.

Did we read the same article? They aren't claiming those things at all. Those are the claims of the original study, which are being disputed by this attempt at reproduction. The writers suspect those claims to be false due to the choice of the original study to not remove likely intentionally non-random data.

I believe the 13% stat you saw is that your score had a higher random score than than 13% of other participants, so not very random.

Applets work well on firefox desktop for me.

Are you on safari/any ios browser? If you are, I suggest using a platform that supports a modern browser. The page and shaders work fine with ublock origin and googletagmanager blocked.

I think the controversies section of your linked article shows that it is not as clear-cut as you imply.

Absolutely I think that they would commit the same atrocities if given the chance. Fortunately as you say their people hopefully don't agree.

That is what I was alluding to when I mentioned that they do not admit their wrongdoings even today. Disputes with e.g. South Korea prove that they still believe they own places they invaded during the war. Educating their citizens on the past and rebuilding trust with the countries who suffered under them would be signs they have changed as a government. Neither of those things take place.

Do we like Japan? They have a shameful history that they have refused to acknowledge. I view them very negatively.

While true, that isn't the point of the rule. The meaning is that _if_ everyone did what you do, what _would_ happen. The practi alities of that are irrelevant. It's really about asking yourself if your actions are sustainable or damaging by scaling them up.

Here's my theory!

Perhaps the writers write the first season fully aware of the probability that they won't be asked to write a second. Then, when it's a surprise hit, they are less sure of what to do following the events of the first.

Interesting what you say about textures, on the main page there are two commercial jets with decals including text on the side. Perhaps they did add them eventually? Or are they just very high poly and still coloured individually?

I have been trying to figure this out myself. The algorithm I'm using is to colour yellow only if the count of that letter before that occurance in the guess, is less than the count of that letter in the target word.

It isn't more work for the maintainer to _not_ close issues purely based on time. This argument has been repeated often. And with the prevalence of lazily-used stale bots, it's not feasible for anyone to make all the forks necessary.

Discussion can eventually lead to a shift, repeating this argument can't.

> Classic colors of royalty

I think this is a stretch, red and blue are also classic colours of royalty.

Assuming that the algorithm is 100% accurate!

Surprised that amazon isn't in there for the horrible UX of sending you to a separate page to change preferences, then back to the homepage.

I don't know of any particular studies on this, but in my own experience comprehension is changed by how quickly I read, not whether the voice is used. Learning this just raises the speed limit for when you want to read easily comprehensible texts such as news or comments.

Yes that works too, probably a nicer one for the HN audience as well! If you can learn to read that way, eventually you won't need to repeat any more and you can read without the voice.

This isn't directly related. It's likely a product of how you were taught to read. You can learn to read without it by trying to have the inner voice say something different like 'a, e, i, o, u' while reading. It takes practice but it increases your reading speed.

Time to start popularising 'Justice is 20/20' then!