331 karma · joined June 21, 2013
It is possible to care about privacy and still accept a more convenient (less secure) way to access specific things.
A group of cats is called a clowder... or a glaring :)
If I could remember how each language handled list operations and JSON/Base64 encoding I could probably code much faster, but the real efficiency gain wouldn't come until I stop reading HN :P
The reason that comment got down voted and the reason I got down voted had nothing to do with PG'S 2008 post. It had everything to do with an abrasive community...
Yet, as my old man used to say, "Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and only the pigs like it." So it is on HN...
QED Turtles all the way down.
I'm glad I didn't have such a bias when I took the job as my equity arrangement gets more exciting every month.
CS talent, please come to Minneapolis. We have beer!
To the other point about this information not being appropriate for the purposes Albright mentioned: Isn't this exactly the information that a health insurance company wants to know for outreach? If I know that all the pregnant women in Tuscon are signing up but none from Pheonix, I suddenly know where to put my next billboard or field office.
If this was a private sector company, nobody would be surprised at collecting this data. It would also be a different story if the data was being stored and analyzed in house or even if the doubleclick request happened on the server side instead of the client.
I agree with the general sentiment that this is a privacy violation, but that's because of the way that the data is collected and who processes it, not the collection and use of the data generally.
Do you have any examples here? I can't think of a time when I've had to hunt long to figure out where things are happening in Rails.
Still, that number doesn't seem accurate for the cut-off for the global 1%
2010 census has over 180,000,000 Americans over age 25. So assuming that there are people making more than $35,000 outside the US, this number still smells fishy...
Sniff test:
World pop: ~ 7,000,000,000
1%: ~ 70,000,000
Population of the US ~ 300,000,000
Median income in the US ~ $50,000
So you can come up with well over 70 million people in the US with incomes greater than $50,000. How then can the global top 1% cut off be $35k?This should be a case study in every civics class...