Avtomatk

Why would the income of immigrants affect your safety or property? Because are you assuming that foreigners are a danger, when a person is dangerous? when he is delinquent or for many other reasons, but that went the first reason that goes to my mind.

Why do you assume that all foreigners are criminals? Criminals should be punished regardless of their country of origin, I agree that mass migration can be dangerous and migration should be a slow and safe process with investigation behind it.

Interesting, thanks for the information.

The best advice anyone can give you, obviously get diagnosed before...

If you have money it's the best thing you can do, I don't have money for medication (I only have enough for depression medication) and I have to manage having OCD without medication.

Hello, reading your article I realized that you are an extremely intelligent person, I don't know if we simply coincide perfectly on this topic and from there we are simply similar people, but I swear I read this article as if I had been the one who wrote it ... I have sent you my ideas derived from your main article as an 'issue' in your repository.

Interesting idea, I would use it on feature rich sites, instead of creating 50 different buttons and screens, just running terminal commands.

Some headaches can easily be mistaken for neck muscle pain from sleeping in an awkward position.

XML (the superset of HTML) is used to create graphical interfaces in android applications... And there are currently many applications developed in electronjs for this same need: Develop graphical interfaces with HTML and CSS

I don't think economies of scale will be lost, they would have more complicated logistics since each country would have its own policies and a deep analysis of the laws of each micro-country would have to be carried out to export... This would be solved with new technology (Imagine consulting a global database if your product is accepted by the policies of most countries, everything would be automated and would have no extra cost).

The micro-countries could create trade agreements with each other (as currently occurs in the countries), such as eliminating import taxes on a product that is in high demand, exchanging resources, pooling wealth to work for a common goal...

Another important aspect would be the judicial system, there could be criminal countries that make theft legal in their territory, if that micro-country is in a strategic place, sooner or later people would have to enter the country... One solution would be for the micro-countries to adhere to a centralized judicial system made up of members from each micro country, similar to how the European Union works.

I have a lot more ideas on this topic, but I am not an expert and cannot validate my hypothesis, or do a deep and detailed analysis of this topic.

I was thinking about something similar: What would happen if the countries were smaller (with a maximum of 1000 people per country)? it would be more appropriate to call them micro-countries, the 1000 people would work together so that their taxes go to improve only the quality of life of those 1000 people, the social and economic laws would be specific to that area, people would have the opportunity to be someone important in their community and not simple fish in the ocean like most workers are...

The logistics in many areas would be very simple... The current governments cannot solve all the problems of a country because the countries are gigantic and each area has its own problems... All this brainstorming could be turned into a more serious analysis if you had the help of experts in sociology, politics, philosophy, history and economics.

I do not have data to support what I say but I believe that fiat money pollutes more than any cryptocurrency...

Just think about the printing of money, the transport of it, the construction of banks, all the bills they issue, the energy that is spend within the same bank, many countries have a relatively active national currency (that means mining)...

In the case of cryptocurrencies you are only spending electricity and production of graphics cards ....

I also think that the bitcoin algorithm is Shit inefficient, but certainly crypto pollutes a lot less than fiat money.

It's the sad double standard that most companies have: Look, I pollute half the planet and I don't give a shit about investing in new technology, I just want my ARR of 100 million, and I'm willing to lie with cheap marketing ... But ransomware It's clearly a priority, we can't risk being attacked if we didn't do anything illegal, that's morally wrong, and I'm a very moral person.

How stupid people are on our planet, billionaire people are really very stupid people ... Put a scientific researcher and an entrepreneur to debate on any subject and that's when you realize that most "entrepreneurs" have the coefficient of a 5-year-old child.

why do we never see Elon Musk debate with researchers if he has as much intelligence as he says (the techno king)? It must be so as not to make a fool of himself on television (or youtube)

using the terms "small" and "big" referring to the weight of an image is confusing... it is better to use "light" or "heavy".

The "bad" people are just ignorant people who do not understand how other people feel (they are not able to put themselves in their shoes), and can only see their side of perspective as the only true ... We should ridicule more "bad" people with this accurate definition.

fabricio teran pol

fabricioteran06@gmail.com

> I'll assume that's still ~3x as costly as just farm raising chickens.

3x? it's not even double

> the websites dependent on ads will eventually cease to exist.

And the free content of the web will also disappear.

But that will never happen... Believing that the content that a person produces should "be free" only shows how pathetic you are and your little experience in software development.

And, modifying 1 pixel from the image, results in a complete different NFT.

GPD Win Max, but is expensive

finally a smart comment. (I never see a company as a friend, companies do not perform acts of kindness, they only seek to grow their profits (except in very rare cases))

There is so much innovation in science that it never materializes because it is not commercially viable for companies.

I am in the same place, I would like to get some advice.

Thanks for the elaborate answer... "When you can explain a complex topic in a way that even a child can understand it, it means that you are truly an expert."

And why not build a team with professionals in each field? Create a cooperative.

I am currently investigating more efficient forms of study (which would imply creating a new language) for the compression of academic text (which is often very long and not very accessible to inexperienced people).

Whoever is interested in studying with me, my email is: fabricioteran06@gmail.com (I speak Spanish)

do you have fee? i have an interesting collection, but fee costs 100USD, is so expensive.

The pros: I earn 150k.

The cons: I don't earn 200k.

Only white male?

What was it that made you come to that conclusion?

I had the same thought when I was 18 (now I am 19)...

You can come to understand the world from your perspective... But, to have a deep and complete knowledge of how the world works, you would have to have omniprescence (the ability to transport yourself to any part of the world) and to be able to get into the thoughts of all people, observing all possible perspectives to reach a final conclusion...

This just to understand the "modern world", with this you could approximate the "why" and the "how" our world works.

Next level, spectate could turn you into a ghost (boring), restart, you will live your life again (if you don't like risks, choose this), but next level is something new.

Personally, I am not interested in getting positive votes, but it bothers me that my comment is "censored" by a couple of people who did not understand what I said and who do not even participate in the conversation... It is like if you were in a meeting in your work and a random person on the street say that your idea is bad and they do not take you into account for it.

> I am not suggesting those videos / channels be banned either just pointing the uneven absurdity of YT's policies.

I make the same clarifications in each comment I make so as not to receive a wave of downvotes, it is incredible how HN decreases in quality more and more.

I face the same problem, I think that programmers can be skilled in a lot of different tasks, but for large projects, our two hands and our brain are not enough, no matter how smart you are, you need co-founders, loneliness leads you to procrastinate eternally.