Great point! :-) I lol'd
15 karma · joined June 4, 2012
They think they look cool by hurting the girl's reputation and her feelings in this horrible way, but in fact they bring to light their real character/intentions and this should give a BIG WARNING to anyone who interacts with such fools to depart from them and distrust them.
On the same par, another tragedy in the story is that there are other retarded cretins like this that support such disrespectful acts, which makes me really angry and sad about the character of some of the young people of today's society.
To me HN is just a ripoff of Reddit.
I tell you why, because their ToS is malformed otherwise you wouldn't have to trust them, you would only need to agree that the contract you signed with them is respected accordingly, by them as well as by you.
Seriously? How certain is anybody that with the new TOS the thief won't steal anything from their house?
If the thief wasn't going to steal from the house in the first place then why its called a thief that is even authorized to steal your goods?
Why is there such a ToS in the first place if the thief is incapable of stealing?
" “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. With these freedoms, the users (both individually and collectively) control the program and what it does for them.
A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms:
- The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
- The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
- The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms. Thus, you should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission to do so. "
64 GNU/Linux distributions that use KDE. Rock and Roll!
I personally use ArchLinux x86_64 with KDE 4.9.3 => UberAwesome!
I work for several years as a software developer in the "corporate world" and I can install whatever the heck I want on my machine.
I totally disagree. Why it should be my job? Do you want to use my product? Then use the right environment where my product works as it should, otherwise GTFO.
I don't want my product be used by incompetent users. Its 2012, people ought to be educated about technology.