9,298 karma · joined May 28, 2010
I'm also an IT admin. Tech background includes: MS365/Azure, Unix sysadmin, network admin, jack-of-all-trades IT support (Mac/PC/iOS).
What are you even talking about?
The people who actually know the science in these areas do not agree with you. Specifically with regard to global warming, the science has been clear on this for decades now: past around 1.5C, we risk cascading effects that could be uncontrollable. This is really fairly common in natural systems: if you mess it up, past a certain boundary effects accelerate and are uncontrollable.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/02/business/stephen-dickson-...
It's not just a protocol. It's a very expensive service platform that Apple runs as a service to its users. Apple is simply not obligated to let Android users use that platform and derive all its benefits for free. It's not.
This isn't anticompetitive; it's an example of Apple being simply better at competing in this particular arena.
The fact that your social circle has certain dynamics doesn't change this at all, of course.
I also recommend cherry tomatoes. More snackable, easier to use them up.
The best bet would be the slice it originally appealed to, with its original kinds of content, in the original medium it was in.
It's awesome.
Great product at a great price. They have a lot of models in the $200-$300 range. Reviews are consistently great.
No, he's not. Wirecutter is in fact extremely useful and reliable, in my experience. This one dude is not 100x better than that. Perhaps in some cases he's slightly better, sure. He is obviously not "orders of magnitude" better.
They shouldn't even be allowed to list a price that doesn't yet include the fees. No asterisks. No appendices. No see below. No fine print. Just list the real price. Always.
FOX affiliates aren't really political at all.
But it's completely absurd. Was there a degree of platform moderation to attempt to reduce covid disinformation, or at least label it as such? Yes. But was there anything remotely resembling effective "censorship" that made it at all difficult to reach "eyeballs" with bogus antivaxxer narratives? No. Of course not. The claim is ludicrous on its face. We were all bombarded with BOTH sides throughout the pandemic.
2. No, the ownership is not in public records, as this story makes clear. Who precisely is behind this seems quite vague.
3. The fact this has been "openly" (whatever that means) happening for 5 years is irrelevant.
4. No, this is begging the question. "Everyone" clearly does not know, at all, what they (who is they?) are doing.
5. What kind of energy infrastructure, precisely?
6. What's the source of your intense desire to deflect on this topic?