599 karma · joined March 11, 2023
(e.g., look at the bluetooth/hci interface on linux.)
At first I tried all kinds of methods to turn it on only when there was something interesting to avoid drowning in terabytes of data, detecting things like: cars, people, animals. I tried classical image processing methods, and tools like Motion, then tried similar image compression algs to find significant macroblocks; then I tried all types of methods in OpenCV; next came several neural nets with off-the-shelf YOLO/SSD object detection (using Google TFUs, Nvidia Jetsons), I even tried retraining the networks with my own tiny dataset.
In the end, everything sucked with too many false positives blowing up my cloud alert SMS traffic to myself. So now I just record 6 cameras nonstop to files. I don't get the benefit alerts, but nothing much happens, and if it does, I have history recorded.
It was a fun project, I tried all kinds of codecs, cameras, languages, frameworks, hardware, etc. I even started out trying to do custom battery-powered wireless device using a raw Chinese MIPI CCDs and building my own WiFI station. I spent over 3 years on it, just to end up with your basic CCTV box. But it was fun!
No way I give them access. I even have them connect to a locked down SSID in my house LAN.
Functional Safety
ASIL
MISRA
ASPICE
ISO 21434
ISO 26262
Yet ... touchscreens.
Of course the whattaboutists are correct: alcohol has the same impact, but for some reason the myth persists that heavy weed use isn't dangerous.
I run stylometrics on your HN posts, then on every document archived by a data broker, including highschool/college papers. I identify you. I can then use that information to extort, harass, or rob you. At scale, anyone who buys this data can do this to tens of thousands of people with scripting. DefCon has had some nice presentations in the past about software that takes this data as input, and generates harassment scripts -- practically as SCRUM tickets -- to do this at scale.
Still think privacy / private data doesn't matter?
People learn faster when they have someone to teach them in a multi-modal environment. Videoconferencing is only a shadow of this, and everything is scheduled. There is zero chance for spontaneity with such a sterile structure.
I'm nearing the end of my career, but I certainly would not have learned as fast as I did without many, many mentors. Just reading the internet, especially when the technology is cutting edge and not even ON the internet, would have left me far behind. And if everyone falls behind, the company falls behind.
I think companies that mandate some amount of in-person time will have less risk of falling behind than those that are 100% remote.
I don't see how all of those junior 100% remote engineers will keep up. Maybe they are all just very very very smart.
Edit: Or if you create a conference that will largely be attended by tech employees you can make bank with a few months of after-work grinding. (Also odd how the op slips in shibari reference in a tech paper.)