80 karma · joined October 16, 2012
Based on what? Within the bubble of hackernews, that's maybe true, but there are (evidently) a very large % of engineers who are either indifferent, or feel the opposite.
How does this fit in with the CAN-SPAM act?
"Unsubscribe compliance
A visible and operable unsubscribe mechanism is present in all emails.
Consumer opt-out requests are honored within 10 days.
Opt-out lists also known as Suppression lists are only used for compliance purposes.
"If there is no unsubscribe option, are google in violation? (Their get-out may be that these are not actual emails, but by making the transition from clear ad space to inbox, most people would argue that the delivery mechanism is irrelevant)
[1] http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/60544/why-do-...
"Share this on Facebook, Twitter, Digg, Delicious, Reddit, LinkedIn, SlashDot, Myspace, Technorati, Friendfeed, Messenger, or Stumbleupon."
An IQ test is also a good proxy for an IQ test: but there would probably be an outcry if companies started basing performance reviews directly on an IQ test.
At a quick glance, couldn't find anything more up to date about their progress.
In that sense, programming languages, regular expressions, and natural language can all be identified by what types of grammar can define them.
Similarly, their mobile app is capable of delivering far less ads than the web page, so they'd rather people sat on that at their desk rather than browsing on their phone.
In relation to lack of decent search and other obviously lacking elements: They're always going to devote far more resources to things which directly or indirectly improve advertising (graph search, friend finding, increasing numbers of likes) rather than things that enhance user experience (since user experience is far more tied to network size rather than feature set, compared to other markets)
Is the point of this article "we managed to get charts into email"? In places there is a bit too much subjective self-praise for anything other than a sales pitch: "...elegant, beautiful, and timely..." I personally think their greyscale and doughnut charts don't look great.