3,183 karma · joined September 13, 2015
Oh, wait, it has personality traits! This little fun experiment was worth it. :)
I believe they aim for selling API access to AI companies, for (re)training data. Third party apps are just taking collateral damage.
Chances are it's so core that some buggy LZMA or something implementation was offloaded to ASIC.
It's either that or iOS-type walled garden, which one you prefer?
By the way, Windows even has the lock-down switch, it's just off by (a sane) default.
Also, blaming OS for not protecting from random app exploits isn't fair.
https://thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-founde...
The oldest traces of infection that we discovered happened in 2019. As of the time of writing in June 2023, the attack is ongoing, and the most recent version of the devices successfully targeted is iOS 15.7.
As s side note, this isn't always desirable for this class of coders. In some scenarios (like web server) you might want to favor throughput over response time.
Otherwise, this could undermine the public disclosure concept itself, a mechanism to force a stubborn vendor to fix their vulnerabilities.
Most people wouldn't kill, but the rest would kill enough for rates to change.
If someone has been waiting for the moment when AI start take human jobs, this is it. And I have mixed feeling about it.
Allowing third-party JavaScript execution on the client is a bold move. They better have both user- and admin-accessible way to disable this.
Is it intentional?