3,183 karma · joined September 13, 2015
Everything becomes fragile at the large end.
0. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/threat-pr...
It's free, but you pay with your data, as always. What you consume, when, how and how much. Also in what mood and your emotional reactions to it, via accelerometer and other side channels. You can opt out of the latter two, the switch is buried somewhere deep in the settings.
The real product is ads that are clearly AI-generated but still acceptable by you. Sometimes even likable.
We should judge people and companies (which are ultimately also people) not by whether they make mistakes, but by whether they learn from them.
fire == safety
Harm vs good assessment, anyone?
With truly decentralized system things would be different.
That's the hard part, IMO.
Imagine that we really got that "decentralized system that cannot be controlled" going and everyone is using it. Everyone, including those who is into illegal things. And they don't get caught.
Now the government starts to push their "this decentralized shit is doing more harm than good" agenda. Whatever their motivation is, it would be easy to sway public opinion against surveillance-free communications, because the harm is real, not hypothetical, like it is now.
…on real or at least representative data.
Actually, SQL is used to hide DBMS implementation complexity and diversity. It was a great abstraction when RDBMS tech progressed rapidly. Now it has matured to stability, and it makes sense to try a better language.