Daimanta

I understand, but my experience with open source projects on Github basically says the opposite. It doesn't really matter how detailed my issue is or if I point to the actual bug in the code, if there isn't a PR it simply gets ignored.

This grinds my gears regularly but I try to let it go because I have no power to solve this issue.

It's the other way around. Translating a problem with a known complexity class to the new problem(in time P) indicates the complexity class.

It's not a "middle name", rather it's an "infix". Some countries/languages have this feature where there is a generic "infix" part of the last/family name. This generic part if fully part of the last name but is so common that it will cause an imbalance in the distribution of names.

To understand this as an English speaker. Imagine people aren't called John Smith, but rather John the Smith and not Bill Boston but Bill of Boston. Now imagine that a large percentage of people had an infix in the name. It would be impractical to order stuff by last name and find a massive index on the letter "o" because all the last names starting with "of" or at "t" starting with "the". To balance this out, parts that would translate to words like "from", "the", "of", "to" or "on" would be considered an index. Part of the last name, but not considered part of the name index. John the Smith would be found at the letter "S" usually structured as "Smith, John the".

According to https://ziglang.org/documentation/master/#Targets the only fully supported targets are x86-64. This does not mean that the entire stdlib will only work on x86-64 but that specific functions that require information about the inner workings of an architecture is only guaranteed to work on x86-84.

If you'd be interested in a hash function like CRC32 you can see in the source code that there is no dependency on arch specific functionality, which makes it likely that it will work fine on other (LE?) architectures. This is on a case-by-case basis at the moment though. The advice from the Zig community is to check the source code in case of doubt. I have always found the source to be accessible, so this hasn't been an issue for me.

"The whole process should be in English. I don’t care that it is Germany. English. English. English. I speak decent German, but the vocabulary of company incorporation was not covered in my Volkhochschule classes nor Duolingo."

The process is difficult because I refuse to learn the language of the country. My first reaction was "What an absolute asshole", my second reaction is the same but with a paragraph of text explaining the reasons he's an asshole.

"This rental does not exist". With the current housing market, this is to be expected.

Interestingly, some people have administrative birthdays were they are born on an uncertain day of the month which is registered as day 0. So, somebody could be born the 0th of june 1950.

If there is even less information available the same goes for the month of the year. I have seen passports where people are born on 0-0-1970

Must be a frustrating situation in many software systems.

To me it does matter as it messes up my biological clock. My body will tell me close to a week that I should or should not be sleeping, waking up, lunch or have dinner. The lost sleep and disorientation is real for me.

Besides that, I hate people fidgeting with the clock. Stop DST permanently, please!

People with tendencies of spending unhealthy amounts of money on games could be classified as having a mental illness. Instead they are indeed targeted and known as "whales".

Ok, so this peaked my interest, so I did some googling. If this soup were to be genuine, references to it should exist.

In the 1968 'Report on soups' by the British Ministry of Agriculture (https://archive.org/embed/op1268165-1001), there is a reference on page 19 to this exact soup (called 'Windsor soup', 'Brown soup' or 'Eton soup'). It even lists the a basic list of ingredients. So this means this soup indeed exists.

Now some further digging. Are there old references to either 'Windsor soup', 'Brown soup' or 'Eton soup' in non-fictional media?

The 1892 'The encyclopædia of practical cookery' does not list this soup, although it is quite sparse on soups.

The 1844 'A New System of Domestic Cookery' list a large amount of soups, none even vaguely hinting at the same name.

However, the 1906 'High-class cookery recipes' (https://archive.org/embed/b21528597) lists a 'Windsor soup' which should have a 'brown colour' as the basis. I think that should qualify as a 'brown roux' basis which at the very least lends some credence to a brown 'Windsor Soup' although I cannot verify the color myself.

Anyway, that's the result of about 15 minutes of googling. At the very least, it makes me a bit sceptical of the article.