1,020 karma · joined August 20, 2022
Of course, any video evidence should be redacted. Seeing that could cause lifelong psychological scars, and in the shorter term, loss of apetite and extreme repeated bouts of nausea.
"silly humans!"
I tried neem and diatomaceous earth against the hoppers. Different mechanisms of action, not total control but good enough for root crops like potatoes. The pumpkins and other squashes also hold up well.
". Within just 15 generations of selective breeding, the experiment had yielded foxes that could live with people."
Those who have been buying food at supermarkets likely strongly disagree lately. Demand at food banks is 3x higher locally this year. So where is the Q&A section for PhD Fed economists?
Moles also burrow everywhere around here but they just eat insects and their eggs afaik.
Other than a little cow manure added to help feed the fungi and plant roots, no other fertilization was required. There are so many great low-tech approaches to get great yields of delicious produce, but it takes some extra initial labor inputs. Maybe when the AIpocolypse hits the labor market, this approach will be economical on larger scales.
Homo economicus...
stage right enter homo paganicus, accompanied by those twins homo philosiphus and homo philobaccus
pass the wine around.
True story, I took a course in environmental microbiology, and at a certain point, the instructor had a slide titled, "Ideal Conditions for Reproduction" and below that the words, "A Swiss Chalet on a cold night, a bottle of wine, and a warm fireplace"
Don't get me wrong: I know this is not a simple question. But data in some "vectorized" form may be swappable between systems that have some requirements regarding NDAs. Invoke Murphy's laws
Some of these "smartest guys in the room" can't smell their own brain feces. It reeks of Enron and the days prior to the 2009 meltdown.
But I cannot agree with the remarks about evolution. Genetic changes don't anticipate anything. Random mutations occur always, and the result is that rare mutations provide unanticipated advantages in unanticipated future circumstances. I can't imagine any other long-term advantages. Sure, we can direct "evolution" in the short term, say, the way dog breeders do, but long-term survival is subject to randomness. Or is this view oversimplistic?
This all looks great on paper or a screen, but in the workplace, it's often about going with the herd, even as a manager.
Is this intelligence at work?