434 karma · joined November 3, 2013
wikipedia:
> Thus, the two kinds of knowledge, justification, or argument, may be glossed:
> A priori knowledge or justification is independent of experience, as with mathematics (3 + 2 = 5), tautologies ("All bachelors are unmarried"), and deduction from pure reason (e.g., ontological proofs).[3]
> A posteriori knowledge or justification depends on experience or empirical evidence, as with most aspects of science and personal knowledge.
There's nothing wrong or controversial about my definition. Non-Experiental Knowledge is Logical Knowledge by exhaustion. "Feeling" is exactly the kind of thing "a priori" was intended to exclude.
> In this sense it is similar to saying that something is axiomatic.
In no sense of the word, colloquial or academic, does "a priori" mean "axiomatic". They are different beasts.
> Besides I'm not at all sure there is a difference between knowledge gained from logic or from experience: <skims youtube video>
The video redefines the Problem of Infinite Regress as "Modus Morons". I've read What the Tortoise said to Achilles myself. Yes, the truth of modus ponens is arguably derived from induction. But that's a topic I'm not going to get into right now. At the very least, the terms are useful to label their disparate track-records.
If you want to dig further, your general position is called Idealism.
More seriously. My takeaway is not "I wish Patreon hadn't issued an apology", but to beware promises without binding contracts or strong signals of fidelity.
This is important because privileging magenta does not generalize to higher-dimensional color-spaces, and therefore impedes to our understanding of phenomenology.
Do you know what it looks like?
Can you imagine what it looks like?
Can Maxwell's equations predict what it looks like?Similarly, suppose scientists discover a neural-structure (or chemical-interaction, etc) responsible for blueness. I can dissect it, electrocute it, soak it in LSD. But will the scientists experience blueness? No, because the structure isn't qualia per se.
The prevailing ideology is that by studying the mechanical nature of coffee machines, we'll ipso facto understand the biochemistry of the beverage. danielam is arguing that this ideology is probably wrong. This is why the Problem of Qualia is a problem.
Suppose humans experienced 12 primary colors. Is a combination of the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 12th "on the spectrum" any more than an exclusive combination of the 2nd and 3rd?
E.g. a "yellow" wavelength is only as bright as its decomposition into red and green. The fact that red & blue aren't adjacent is a red herring.
(Except for the tetrachromatic 2%, who experience a 4th primary color where "yellow" ought to be.)
> Sorry, the page you were looking for does not exist.
Link is broken. From browsing, I believe the correct link is
https://numenta.com/papers-videos-and-more/resources/layers-...
Consider a group of mutalisks. If you select-all and issue an attack-command or move-command, the mutalisks will bunch up tight and then disperse. Cf a video on the "magic-box technique".
So I wouldn't be surprised if position-values were floats.
Macro refers to decisions regarding economy. It includes finances, build order, counters, etc. Macro is mostly strategic.
Micro refers to decisions regarding battle. It includes troop positioning, focus fire, kiting, etc. Micro is mostly tactical.
Mechanics refers to execution. I.e. do your fingers have the dexterity and APM to accomplish your goals effectively? If not, practice makes perfect.
But what would it even mean to construct a numeral-system with a non-integral radix?
cf.
f(x) = x^2 + 1
x := 2
f(2) = 5illegals labeled citizens: 0.01
[15] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-07-11/at-sears-...
> Plagued by the realities threatening many retail stores, Sears also faces a unique problem: Lampert. Many of its troubles can be traced to an organizational model the chairman implemented five years ago, an idea he has said will save the company. Lampert runs Sears like a hedge fund portfolio, with dozens of autonomous businesses competing for his attention and money. An outspoken advocate of free-market economics and fan of the novelist Ayn Rand, he created the model because he expected the invisible hand of the market to drive better results. If the company’s leaders were told to act selfishly, he argued, they would run their divisions in a rational manner, boosting overall performance.
Held legally accountable? Lmao. Guile is part of the game and all your credits belong to Eve.
Another advantage: each note of a diatonic scale is mapped injectively. Cf. representing each line (or space) as a whole-tone, which leads to hash-collisions (e.g. "is that a G or a G#?"). Each note on a line (or space) on which collisions occur would need an accidental. Which defeats the purpose of key signatures.
A diatonic scale contains an odd number of unique notes. The fact that C lies on a line while C' lies on a space is an unfortunate artifact of representing a 7-note scale with alternating lines and spaces.
.beware("could not open file");* For each M-mass, the centrifugal-vector lies along the x-axis.
* For each m-mass, the centrifugal-vector lies along the z-axis.
* For each centrifugal-vector, the magnitude is proportional to "the point-mass's distance from the disk's axis-of-rotation (the y-axis)". Since the m-masses move along a unit circle in the yz-plane, their magnitudes vary.
E.g. an m-mass which starts at (0, .9, .1) will accelerate towards (0, 0, 1) then deccelerate towards (0, -.9, .1). Then it will retrace its path. This results in oscillation between (0, .9, .1) and (0, -.9, .1) along a semi-circle in the yz-plane.
N.b. no oscillation will occur if an m-mass starts at exactly (0, 1, 0).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjBOesZCoqc&list=PLZHQObOWTQ...