398 karma · joined March 15, 2016
Can you clarify this statement? I don’t understand what you mean.
The Shire itself is set in the ruins of a collapsed kingdom destroyed long ago by the Witch King. The last vestiges of the old order, the Rangers, patrol the land to try to push back the monsters. They collect no taxes. They pass no laws. The people of the Shire are largely unaware of them at all.
This is a clear statement of Tolkien’s politics, that an idyllic society like the Shire is the result of the hard work of good people shielded from the evils of the world. The role of the King then is to protect the people from these threats while otherwise not involving himself in the day-to-day lives of the citizens.
Citation needed.
“Meet the world's most repairable premium earbuds.”
Okay, if you’re going to lead with This as your flagship feature… well, that says to me they must be complete garbage. Is this a joke?
No amount of whining and hand wringing from engineers will ever make this true. This is for the courts to decide.
A reasonable interpretation, in my eyes, is that the training process is a black box which takes in copyrighted works and produces a training model. The training model is a derivative work of the inputs. It therefore violates the copyrights of a large number of rights holders. The outputs of the model are derivative works which also violate copyright.
And anyone using or training a model trained on works for which they do not have the rights? Completely fucked. Or at least, they must accept this as a real risk.
The RISC-V folks would probably tell you that the compressed instruction set nets the same code density benefits you'd see on more complex ISAs. Myself, I haven't studied it enough to have a real opinion.
RISC proponents tout its benefits for energy efficiency, which is a pretty important thing these days. Though, that might be up for debate. This paper states that "there is nothing fundamentally more energy efficient in one ISA class or the other. The ISA being RISC or CISC seems irrelevant." <https://research.cs.wisc.edu/vertical/papers/2013/hpca13-isa...>
Personally, I think the RISC vs CISC debate is just a little bit dated. The ideas behind RISC were new and exciting in the 80s. The equation had changed and there was a lot of room for innovation and improvement with sweeping changes to computer architecture. They were thinking about how instructions could be pipelined, how compilers would allocate registers, how profiling showed that seldom-used instructions can be deadweight that literally holds a system back. Then in the 90s, the equation changed again. Pentium Pro style superscalar architecture showed that you can do well with even a terrible ISA if you're able to throw enough transistors at it.
I don't care about Autopilot and instead want to comment on some of the rest of your list. What are you going on about?? Veggie Patty is not a marketing lie in the slightest. It's a patty. It's made of plants. That's about as straight-forward as possible. The mRNA vaccines do in fact make use of mRNA; no lie there. Almond milk is a fine name. It's milk from an almond in the dictionary definition of the word. Really struggling to understand what you're getting at here...
(I haven’t watched that episode of the show. Does he go over this?)
They do. I don't know what misunderstandings could lead you to believe that phone makers don't already spend significant effort and resources on power efficiency.
It’s not difficult to buy old 74x181 and 74x182 ICs on eBay. You can even get sixteen-bit ALUs like the IDT 7831 for decent prices.
Build a register file from a bank of registers. For example, use a 74x138 and a few 74x377.
Alternatively, either use a true dual port SRAM to build a three port register file, or build your own from a time-multiplexed SRAM and some bus transceivers.
Complex combinational logic can be implemented in an EEPROM truth table pretty easily.
Sometimes, part of the fun is figuring out how to build a complex device from a very limited palette of parts.