The only achievement here is for the lawyers.
72 karma · joined May 11, 2023
>everyone who has asked to setup a billing situation has been ignored.
Well that's kinda messed up.
>posting publicly and voluntarily with the expectation of moderation
I find this statement a bit difficult when it is perhaps a duty to participate in the public square or whatever square is used to embody the desires of common or public will. If people are deterred from this arena without cause and abuse then perhaps we have failed. This entire ecosystem rests on the belief of decency or fairness. I have yet to see it.
>The issue here is the public's expectation of privacy in certain situations. In fact, no one (or very few people, anyway) dispute the need for states to surveil sometimes. The question is when and what oversight should be required. And in this case the the argument is that oversight was sidestepped.
That is incorrect. During the oversight committee they identified there was a consistent mis-interpertation of the law (now corrected) from one side to the other under 702 which perhaps enabled unauthorized use (which perhaps was appropriate under other sections). It was up to (not just due to mis-interpertation) 30% of searches in error in the potential to be in the millions of incorrect searches. I dont see much oversight for other codes. We have possibly 10,000 people with access to obtain information and we are not close to consistent oversight given moving codes and authorizations. Congress has failed the bodies that keep us safe but not without some significant non-compliance. [1]
Private access to information probably has great advantage over public ones. I believe we should consider carefully how we want to yield the power the public sector has given us. The potential for private and public conflict on this matter is significant.
We should not shoo people away with differing opinions. If language models are the future for communication and teaching while they are learning with data off of 'public' and 'accurate' discorse we are very much in danger of having a future led by biases inherent in these models (from moderation and 'weeded garden' environments) that 'isnt a problem' to the people creating the future.
Their messaging is probably to get all of the other apps ect to sell out to the big boys or essentially get fired from their own company.
The language model war is in full swing now the moats are starting to form.
They're betting big on continued engagement or they actually want it to fail. Time will tell.
If you have to wait 2-3 days to comment the moment as they say has passed and very few would read it.
This is a pretty neat black polymer with Long-Wave Infrared Transparency.
I question their use of the y chromosome as unfair (joke)
I think they would be doing society a favor if they actively made it harder to find answers to problems just by googling or using a language model.
This is where identity matters using language models. I feel it might be necesary to credential capability for a few things.
This tweet alone could probably dox someone.