The data was hacked, true. I also wish hackers respected people's privacy, but they don't appear to share that sentiment.
If the people responsible are ever apprehended, I'm sure they will face substantial jail time or worse, depending on their country.
None of this information leaked would stand up in court, as it should be, because it was attained by illegal means.
With all that said, just like any other piece of information in history that is leaked to the press, from government documents to private communications, if it has news value, it is reported on. Doesn't justify what the hackers did, but collectively sticking our heads in the sand about the contents of the hack, simply because we disagree with the way it was attained, is idealistic fantasy with no basis in reality. On that premise, any piece of information ever leaked by a whistleblower would have had to have been discarded immediately because it was illegally obtained. Sure, I agree that a lot of the stuff reported in this Sony hack, like Joel McHale wanting a discount on televisions, may not have been newsworthy. That's certainly up for debate, but clearly this information is newsworthy and I don't see any reason why the media shouldn't report on it, the media didn't do the hacking....