243 karma · joined October 18, 2012
Much of the government management eg subsidies are also favorable to big operations. The expertise of knowing about them, filing and complying correctly, and in some cases even qualifying all are weighted to large players.
The canonical path is something like(this is documented somewhere):
8.0 > 8.4 > 9.0 > 9.3 > 10.0 > 10.4 > 11.0 > 11.2
Although I've had decent luck jumping straight from X-STABLE branches.
Op did acknowledge the artistic value, so not sure why your response is simply an appeal to artistic value.
"Lines", to use your emphasis, are by far the major time component so for me this is a meaningless distinction. Normal traffic merges should of course be accepted gracefully.
Almost exclusively these people will zip around a line and force their way in at the end. Even kindergartners are taught budging in line is not good.
Why is this the problem on the people actually being considerate and are in the correct lane at the appropriate time?
Regardless of FF's little quirks, I use it almost exclusively for personal stuff. I would rather deal with those types of things than the mentality Chrome brings to table.
Exercising to the point of burning >1000 calories is not trivial. You're basically committing to run like 8 miles just for that amount. Then you'll still be hungry with the additional food.
Your BMR is far more important to weight loss than what most people can do with exercise.
Fees: X Taxes: Y
And that's it. So it doesn't seem that policy would help much regarding the point of this article.
https://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/if-you-want-build...
> “Lift to the point of exhaustion and it doesn’t matter whether the weights are heavy or light.”
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2008-Au...
I like that one. Makes it seem like its a perpetual motion machine and we all know how that ends.
eg https://people.freebsd.org/~rpokala/2017-03-24.nvdimm.txt
A citizen's level of responsibility increases for those who advocate for such actions, and the level increases with a wide and strong advocacy.
To attempt to wipe the slate clean of such responsibility is grossly unfair for everyone involved and must involve some deeper issues of which I will not speculate. The fact there was an appeal to eminent death as a reason to not call this out is absurd. A terminal condition doesn't retroactively absolve responsibility.
This is coming from someone who thinks the Iraq war was needed however it was done so in the height of incompetency.
Doesn't stick = Intentional devaluation Sticks = Brilliant capitalization of the market.
Tab back then was far more popular than today. It was at today's level of Dr. Pepper.
The comment I replied to seemed to reference far more than chat.
That is blatantly false, but I get the premise behind it. Writing and maintaining complex stuff in bourne or bash is not fun or easy.
I always use bourne until certain level of complexity or awkwardness is reached. It's pretty easy to write and dead simple to troubleshoot.
If only...