Google234

It’s definitely worth clamming up in the fraction of the fraction of situations that the author describes (female founder + potentially very negative feedback) if it means avoiding a Ellen Pao type situation. On one side you have something that could destroy your reputation, work, and cost you and on the other is holding back advice that may or may not help someone a bit.

Also, are really downplaying what happened and ignoring the fact that it could have ended up much worse for KP.

Very cool! I’m looking forward to see seeing how it performs.

This is pretty straight forward stuff.

Maybe grade inflation is a thing?

Somehow, by the time it reaches any of my multiple inboxes it’s not 99% spam

You don’t know if that’s true and Apple hasn’t hidden the fact that they removed it.

Why should can’t we discuss not focus if the regulator is suspect? This seems like an overreach to me and other mobile phone sellers have much much worse practices that hurt consumer.

They are moving towards wireless charging which will solve that issue.

You think it should be illegal to raise prices?

That’s .001% of information that describes a processor. Anyway people measure it and provide it today too.

I would imagine that 99% of people wouldn’t be happy with a service that is 99% spam.

You don’t get it, 100s of billion of these notifications have been shown already to users on desktop with a less than 1% accept rate. These are spam .

99% of apps you download aren’t spam unlike the 99% of web notification requests that are spanmy

CVS has no problem sending text notifications. You can send informative alerts without any sensitive info.

Push notifications are subject to the same HIPPA rules as sms. You can’t included sensitive info.

I’m the same as the the users of Firefox who deny 99% of notifications https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/11/04/restricti...

We are the the 99%

Have those users download some simple app if this is so important to them. Or let them enter their phone number to get more reliable text notifications. Just because you have a good use doesn’t outweigh the all the bad abuse.

People could also build cool websites if your computer gave all sites kernel access into your computer. Doesn’t make it a good idea

Every other platform supports these notifications and yet somehow 99% of the sites that do it are using it for spam.

To be fair, that’s a very old phone and IOS12 is still getting updates in 2021. I’m not sure that the issue is, safari is updated along with IOS.

I don’t want websites to be able to send notifications to my phone. Sites abuses this and are always asking on my computer and it’s too easy to accidentally say accept.

“8% effective in over 65s” from the German press, “quasi-ineffective in over 65s” from Macron, and “I’m not going to take it because I’m 67” from Merkel, all sound like there is some politics involved to be.

The Norwegian cases don’t make any sense statistically. If they were correct, we would have seen 100s of cases in the UK by now.

Thanks for further damaging safety/credibility of the AstraZeneca vaccine to the public’s for no good reason. It’s obvious that this was completely political act. Wasn’t Macron spreading the rumor just a few weeks ago that the vaccine isn’t effective for those 65 and older?

Any chance this story was made up?

I’m guessing that they were exaggerating a bit. I think nature now charges like 12k for open access with makes that number more reasonable.

I’m glad there’s a company that is willing to protect its customers from abusive devs. If there are a few false positives then too bad, nothing is perfect.

Yes you can. Try and sell a product at any store and demand they take a 0% cut

Only a few percent of papers submitted actually get published. There is some amount of work involved. Also, these top journals hire full time editors (former scientists in ther field).

That decisions is made all the time with drugs that have side effects. Setting the speed limits also is a balance between a deaths and convenience

Un, Myanmar could just deploy soldiers with machine guns or shoot rockets and achieve the same thing? How is that different?

Very interesting info. It doesn’t seem too surprising that there might have been some consistency issue with manufacturing early on. Though it seems a little late to be trying to spread misinformation about the Pyzer vaccine. A manipulated leak like this could have done a lot of harm a few months ago though.