submissions comments The opposite. Laws are just conceptual representations of underlying intractable processes.
Why can’t it be reinstalled?
By say he means think. It’s a figure of speech.
Google is the new Kodak.
Given that the brain is a physical object subject to all quantum effects, wouldn’t the novelty be that it doesn't use quantum effects? That it does sounds obvious.
Your conclusion does not follow from your assumptions. You clearly twisted your reasoning to provide an anti-Semitic argument.
English is great for technical writing.
I don’t know. ChatGPT has sticked.
Well, I’d argue that could also be a bit enlightening. It’s like taking a moment to appreciate that forests are composed of single trees. It takes a certain level of insight to appreciate systems at various depths.
That’s a correct usage of the factorial.
You can, but you have to play towers of Hanoi.
This is actually quite reasonable and sensible. It’s the future of warfare. People are not willing to fight in trenches anymore.
It’s not random. It’s called the Crentist effect or nominative determinism.
Up to the point where it’s considered criminal negligence by the executives.
It’s the arrogance that kills. Not the spring.
Famous last words.
It’s like for an elevator. The motor is there for the friction but the potential energy of the system is approximately constant.
You just need one clinic there that offers it. Why is the relative number relevant?
The general public doesn’t care. Only developers.
So paradoxically, by NATO increasing in members, its non-MAD strength decreases.
I assume it’s calculated from the propulsion positioning system.
Because not boarding the plane is much worse than waiting at the airport.
It’s not about the mode but the max.
That’s called moral hazard.
It’s the Jonah paradox.
Bananas have a mass distribution so they aren’t comparable as a ratio. There’s no “banana.”
Not all functions have a trivial transformation.
Yes sure but now you have to handle two ids and guaranteeing uniqueness across machines or clusters becomes hard.
What do you mean shift to x86?
Could you please share any links or pointers for that? Sounds interesting.
← Previous Page 4 of 7 Next →