"the Claude Agent SDK and claude -p still draw from your subscription limits"
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
7,311 karma · joined June 21, 2024
"the Claude Agent SDK and claude -p still draw from your subscription limits"
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
"the Claude Agent SDK and claude -p still draw from your subscription limits"
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
I don't think I'm selfish, so that leaves me with naive or ignorant, I guess.
Is it, though? If one weird thing happening once is the threhold for when we should be concerned, we should be concerned about literally every model ever released.
Apple famously put "if you run to the press and trash us, it never helps" into their App Store Guidelines for developers, but the only reason they did have to do that is because it's a lie. Running to the press is the only thing that helps, which is why people do it.
To be clear, it clicks things to do things like test software. If you build an API, you're not testing if the clicking actually works.
Grabbing market share by making losses only helps if it actually wins you a genuine monopolistic market position.
You're assuming that these won't matter because attackers might not have better models than I do, but that doesn't make sense. The assumption that attackers can't find the issues because I didn't find them at release is wrong. Even if they never get better models (which they will), current models might find flaws I missed, and they also have other means of finding flaws in my software.
The best defense is to make software as secure as possible regardless of assumed attacker capabilities at the point of release.
Sure. The problem is that there is no practical difference between "cybercrime capability" and "cybercrime defense capability."
All of my PRs go through an adversarial security review by GLM-5.3, because it's the only smart-enough model with a good understanding of cybersecurity issues that won't regularly refuse the job. Removing that ability from frontier models helps nobody except cyber criminals.
Well, problem solved. He certainly used his new position to get rid of his debt.
I think I'd target companies and provide customized solutions. "Hey, everybody in your company connects their agents to this, and boom, they all produce consistent output that matches your company's CI."
This kind of stuff just puts even more distance between established engines and smaller projects like Servo.