Except Apple would still exist as one of the world's most profitable company. That's the underlying value.
610 karma · joined June 13, 2016
There is a third way, assuming the Android license allows for it:
Microsoft concedes they can't replace the OS layer
Microsoft forks Android
Microsoft focuses on the next battle that could be won: making Cortana/whatever the default digital assistant in their build.
For fun, let's then assume Google tries to block this.
Microsoft sues Google for "bundling" and uses their own case where they were forced to unbundle the web browser as precedent.
(I say this as someone who likes his iPhone but hates Siri.)
More like "woman who barely knows a region and visited it for a paltry amount tries to inject herself back into the cultural conversation decades later via via her re-heated leftovers from 1970."
Didion has always been a world-class narcissist and clearly she will be until the end.
We regret to inform you that starting tomorrow, our organization, our parent company, our subsidiary company, and our affiliate partners will no longer be able to provide you services.
Unfortunately, all of our employees read your post and they agree with you and they have all quit to follow their bliss and have left en mass for Chiang Mai until they can "figure out what that means."
Candidly, we expect a large increase in the number of people working as life coaches.
As a result, we will no longer be able to provide the following services:
- Retail employees to help you - Any sort of clerical work - Coal mining and other energy gathering work that requires outdoor and or physical work - Water plants and filtration systems - Less glamours medical care - All the law jobs you don't know about but which keep our world running as well as it does - And any and all sundry job that aren't cool enough to be in an TV commercial
By this letter, we formally requests you stop spouting your bullshit.
Further, we encourage you to consider the implicit flip-side of your argument that, to paraphrase, one can only be happy or have a meaningful life if one does what they love. The incredibly insulting inference being that people who don't do exactly what they love can't possibly be happy or have a meaningful life.
Good luck with your parakeet farm or whatever it is you do.
Cordially,
The Good People at JustTryingToMakeRent Co.
I haven't used SVB but it can't be worse than the big banks.
Serious people are people willing to put their time and/or money into a cause. All power to these people but they are a fraction of the critical mass needed in any social campaign.
Genuine people are people who are sympathetic and have good intentions. They will do / not do what is helpful to the cause but it's not on of their top X priorities. Every movement needs lots and lots of these people. But these people will flee if a situation becomes toxic or they feel like they have more to lose than they can risk.
For example, few "genuine" men would ever write the article written by the OP, which essentially says, it's a pipeline problem. Why? Because even if they could prove with hard data that the biggest factor is the lack of female applicants they would still get torched by the ideologues. So the safe choice is not to engage, give a little extra consideration to the few female applicants received, and move on with your day.
Welcome to branding / advertising / marketing.
Spotify, Pandora, and Soundcloud fixed just about everything that people said was wrong with the industry from the consumer point of view. And don't give me that line about the labels screwing artists because thanks to fans who won't even pay for a premium subscription, Spotify literally can't afford to pay artists more without going under entirely.
TL;DR - music doesn't want to be free. Selfish people want it to be free.
Uber and everyone else will be intermediated.
Let's assume their fill rate is only 50% of their total time. That's still ~$32k USD / year. This is great money even in a developed country like Russia where the median income is ~$5k/USD/year.
1) they're used to the benefits that come from a company that is swimming in cash
2) they didn't personally take any of the risk to create that firehose of cash but they want you to treat them like they did.
3) they don't realize it, but they're used to working in very protected environments. Typical career paths look like top-tier college -> Google / FB / Twitter / whatever. None of this prepares them for sitting in a room with some shitty Ikea desks and trying to make hard decisions that will have a direct impact on the companies growth. No, we don't have the time or resources to build a new JS framework.
I'd much rather higher someone from a second-tier US college or from overseas that can show me a time when they took significant risk / projects they built from scratch.
^ All of this is in relationship to < 20 employee companies trying to get from zero to 1.