227 karma · joined May 20, 2007
PS: IMO there is a difference in power and efficacy.
You will succeed if
1. You have a market
2. You service that market better than most or better
3. You can do what you are doing for years at a length. And then keep doing it some more without even thinking about it.
The challenge is that the current system is generic, it allows you to choose any field of work or study and that choice can be postponed. In your school, that choice is made early and that brings with it a risk.
I think your pain was that 'you' felt mentally caged in the current educational system and that 'you' fixed your pain by making a change. What you seem to be doing now is applying a 'mass fix ' by generalizing/abstracting your problem, and while that works in most cases it may need additional fleshing out. Perhaps the fix for each individual might be more effective, perhaps everyone who feels caged needs to apply an individual patch just like you did rather than fix something which isn't broken when they are in 6th grade. Are we fixing before there is a pain?
Hope these thoughts help you develop your idea. Best of luck.
How does a 6th grader know that she wants to be a startup-founder?
Are you attempting to replace an admittedly broken schooling system with another one?
Are you attempting to increase creative space? If so, can creativity be decoupled from freedom? Are you going to force them to be creative?
Finally, at a risk of sounding a tad off. What good will this do anyone? What pain are you fixing? Is there a pain big enough? Why hasn't it fixed itself yet?
This title could use editing if any title needs editing - "Fuck Facebook Conversion: Be platform agnostic and use your own APIs. " I appreciate that the title of the blog entry is such, but then the site doesn't look clean with this title. I must also say, I think this aspect of the new changes might be a tad over zealous perhaps even anti-septic.
Regarding your second point - Titles are made to tempt people to click and most times the original blogger or author might use such a ploy.We might use the original authors title and he may be doing the spinning. How far down the line can you edit? Again the "Fuck Facebook" title is a case in point.
I urge you to reconsider the editing. Thoughts?
1. This site hasn't stopped being about startups.
2. Lots of people are bored with just reading about startups. Because beyond a point you need new material to spark interesting thoughts. Like many others here I am an entrepreneur for over 3 years and am now working on a web startup idea myself. I find stories such as #3, #5 and #6 useful - they contribute directly to my goals. Remember what stays on top is still decided by the people. And we won't go down the 'digg' path unless the audience that submits and votes changes - which is a problem I am certain PG is aware of and he has made references to some solutions that he is trying to put in place for keeping the stories interesting.
3. I have found that I find stories that PG submits interesting. As long as that is true he is a good measure for the typical audience.
4. Finally between stimulus and response I have freedom of choice. I will up vote only stories I like and I think that might be a great way to participate in the content.
Thoughts??
I am working on a startup idea which will also have high traffic and I am personally using Schevo - which is a non-sql Object DBMS for python based on Durus. I like Schevo because SQL sucks and using Schevo is like you a programming language - in this case its Python. You can check out the Schevo project at www.schevo.org. This would work for you only if you are using Python (highly recommend). Schevo does not have very good documentation yet, but it has excellent support on the IRC and Google Groups from its creators - at least I have found them to give complete and quick responses.Hope this helps.
PS: As an after-thought, social pressure may be more adaptable than software.
My reasons:
+Web startups should not be valued over 10 yrs, this is demonstrably much longer than most significant startups last Also consumers in the web world have short attention spans.
+Esitmated Prime page views aren't validated
+Prime CPM growth rate increases 400+% over 10 years, which even after adjusting for inflation seems to be a strech.
I think facebook will lose value over the coming year. If they wish to sell, they must do it soon. This is because the industries understanding of the valuations for acquisitions such as DoubleClick will correct. The multiples are too high.
Rokhyakebe in your suggested model marketers will have the vision and not the craft and programmers will have the craft and not the vision.
Job B if you want to encourage your technique.
To improve my programming I generally do things that I can't figure out how to do in my head.