LeafItAlone

I don’t think you’re in the right country for that to ever happen.

For one, what you consider “wasteful”, others might not.

Maybe consider being an entrepreneur and go start your own country?

Well, let me tell you that you should be extremely cross. Unless nobody knows your address or you’ve signed up for any services, these companies already have your information.

> I believe that anyone who says that writing code is no longer needed, was probably not a very good coder to begin with. I have seen what the best models can do, and I've seen what people call "good", and I am not impressed.

I envy you.

I believe that anyone who holds this position has been extremely lucky/fortunate to work with only top-tier developers. And does not read or work with open source projects.

Last year’s models are producing code better than _at least_ 50% of the developers I’ve worked with. Today’s frontier models are better than probably 75%. If the code that humans have been generating has been “good” (on average) or at least good enough, then the models that exist today are producing “good” code.

> I think what people are missing is that people often become craftsman because we want to be able to keep the code adaptive and performant so we can provide business value quickly and efficiently.

Nearly everyone I’ve worked with that would say this ended up being the in the bottom quartile of those shipping features and their code was often the most complex. At least in small, “fast”-moving companies.

A few people I have worked with have nailed it, but they were the ones to balance present and future weighted towards present.

I’m confused.

Is your point that programmers are generally worse than plumbers and HVAC installers? People except software to be trash and barely usable, but have higher expectations for plumbing and HVAC?

Some bricklaying may be art. Not all bricklaying is art.

> I miss discussions and debates about architecture and solutions to problems.

If you aren’t having these, then your team is using these tools wrong. AI assisted coding should open you up to more of precisely these conversations. Then use them to implement that.

> only to be passed the modern equivalent of a LMGTFY link hurts in a very particular way

Apt analogy, because if you are asking questions that can be answered with the AI equivalent of a Google search, you are wasting someone else’s time.

> Plumbing pays pretty well

Plumbing does not pay well for the average plumber. Not doctor-well at least, which is what you are responding to.

Can some plumbers make good money? Absolutely. But you need to do dirty, body-breaking work for years.

There’s nothing wrong with being a plumber and it’s a profession we surely need young people to go into. But the pay and trade offs vs a white color job will lean heavily in direction of the latter.

LLMs can provide the intentions of the code they write. To say they can’t is saying that they can’t fix bugs, which they very obviously can do effectively. So, just tell them to write the intention in the way you want it. If you are implicitly providing the direction in the prompt, make that explicit - you then it will have the context for the change while working and for the commit message and you’ll likely get a higher quality output.

Fix your harness. Provide rules, format, and good examples.

You probably had those for the humans in your team for when new hurts join, right? Just direct your LLMs to them and you’ll have a much better experience.

Just like you can’t expect a new junior dev to know what to do without direction, the same applies with LLMs.

A big win of LLMs in my book is the absolute reduction of commit messages with just “fixes” or “updates”. Commit messages have become more meaningful and useful, even if far from perfect.

We have one dev who uses LLMs to write the code, but still commits by hand. Most of his messages are of the type above, and none of them are useful.

This is certainly a problem with out-of-the-box usage. But easily overcome. Spend time updating your harness. This is not a hard problem to solve and there are many helpful guides out there.

We basically took our documented (human) SDLC process and applied it to the relevant harness hooks. Since our SDLC docs talked about what good comments looked like and what to avoid, we basically had the direction for the tools. Opus 5 did throw us a loop and increase the verbosity and decrease usefulness of the text, but refining our documentation cleared that hurdle within about a day.

You need a better harness. LLMs are significantly better at this than humans. Add it as a step in your LLM process and your documentation will always be up to date.

I personally find it unbelievable that you have access to all of the public GitHub projects available and still think the typical developer writes good code.

We’ve been tracking performance and bugs for years. Including commits those bugs were introduced in. So when LLM-generated code started working its way into our codebases, we have the before and after. And even comparing human generated code today with LLM-generated code today.

Depends on the prior state.

For one codebase I work in, LLM written code is noticeably and measurably (we have literally measured it for bugs, performance, etc.) better than what existed before. So the LLM code is a welcome change.

Dude, just be nice and let people have fun. Raspberry Pi’s have made it possible for people to do things they never otherwise would have done! It is pretty amazing!

That seems a little unfair.

1. It’s so much easier using RPis for that work. It can be done with no soldering at all and there are tons of easy to use libraries. Not having to solder is a huge plus IMO and I have a workstation with iron, hot plate, air gun, etc. ready and waiting.

2. Why hate on doing it Python? Even ESP32 embedded development ecosystem treats Python well with CircuitPython and MicroPython.

3. At least they are making something!

4. Even a simple ESP32 is overkill for what you described, so why are you hating on people using an RPi when your suggestion is just as laughable when taking your hardcore embedded stance?

As someone who has been working on embedded work since RadioShack was a good source of components - let’s not gatekeep makers.

That page is… a lot, on mobile.

Here’s the tech specs page, which is also busy: https://pollen-robotics.com/microduck/press-kit/

Interesting how all of the replies so far to your comment assume we’d just release the existing animals into the wild instead of just not breeding more.

This is such an ironic blog post it hurts.

What is snarky about that?

The answer is so that they can charge different prices per credit. If you buy low amounts, they can charge one price. If you buy in bulk, they can offer a discount. The usage is the same, but they can differentiate price per usage to give people more a favorable price if they are better customers.

Is there anything wrong with that?

I would love to hear more about this!

Don’t worry. This advice has been going around for much more than 2 months, including links posted here as well as official advice from the major companies (OpenAI and Anthropic) themselves. The tools literally have had plan mode as a first class feature.

So you probably wouldn’t have any clout anyways, like all of the other blog posts.

>what's the value of paying someone for a product like this vs just building it myself?

Same thing it’s always been. Convenience. Including maintenance costs. AI tools have lowered the bar significantly on some things, so SaaS offerings will need to be better, but I don’t want to reinvent every wheel. I want to build the thing I want to build, not the things to build that.

Just like I go to restaurants instead of making every meal myself.

I lived in such a place and never had power outages. Mostly because the power company came through on a regular basis (two years or so) and chopped down and trees that could cause problems. Some areas definitely looked terrible from a beauty standpoint, but it meant keeping power.

Who paid the $20k?

I’ve had a cheap (was $15) single salad spinner, for about 15 years. Decent amount of usage in that time, but not professional level.

So my question to you is: what the heck are you doing to your salad spinners?

All of this was on a Bambu A1 Mini?

These are the types of things I want to print. My Ender 3 was so finicky, I only got a few out before I gave up.