Educated as a biomedical engineer with focus in electrical and software engineering. I am lazily managing an online-retail lifestyle business, 2006 - present. Currently, I am a full time day trader.
Location: Kailua-Kona, HI
email:
my user name without underscore (alloneword) at gmail
If they are doing this without disclosure, they are adding counterparty risk without consent. Just because they didn't blow up does not mean they can't. It doesn't even have to be due to your trade but someone else's. There have been single trades that have blown up international banks. Rare, and probably irrelevant here, but a point for perspective.
Yes. Mindfulness is not about just being present during pleasurable moments. A lot of the value, to me, is being present when my mind or expectations conflict with the world around us. That leads to an examination of ourselves, insight, and ultimately growth. This is very different than the withdrawl into feel good moments, which is what is often sold to us.
I do something like what you are saying but with selling covered calls while I am long a stock. A quick search online will show you strategies like this. It is not uncommon for more active equity traders.
I mostly play long cycles in the equity market instead of trading. When I do trade equities, I play one or two stocks that I know their behavior intimately. My very active trading is mostly in futures and currencies.
I worked in this field a bit at Baylor. There are those who want to model the 'hardware' down to every complexity and those who want to figure out the 'software' that emerges from the physical hardware. The groups communicate but are fairly divided.
Does it tune itself or is static? It definitely tunes, but it can be meaningful to the algorithm or ignored.
"But it doesn't get truly dangerous until people are buying stocks with borrowed money. "
Currently, the borrowed money is nearly free money via low interest rates. A lot of games are being played to juice out every cent that can be made on being able to get cheap money. When the value of assets used to play these games are ignored vs. the diminishing profit. It becomes musical chairs.
I doubt we get your everyday Joe betting on margin like the dotcom bubble, but we have the same effect, just different users.
Isn't the promotion transparent enough to not be shitty? To me is seems more like, 'if you are going to do it anyway and are on the fence about who you are going to go with, try us!'.
This is my understanding as well. I get great info talking with smallcap to the just barely midcap companies if you ask the right questions. Heck, usually, I am able to get a conference with a VP or CEO if my questions go above paygrade. I am no whale.
In practice, you will not get the same level of info on larger companies if you are not institutional or in a group of retail investors holding a decent share-count. Information obtained is usually a small amount above what is found on the conference call or via google.
The problem with re-using a box is that it loses a lot of integrity after the initial shipment. Its crush rating is reduced and chance of tear increases sharply. Many damaged and ripped parcels at the post office are due to box reuse or bad packaging combined with incorrect crush rating.
For more sensitive areas, scramble pads are usually used. Solves a lot of security issues if you think anyone will go through much effort to get into an area.
In the book he expanded on what was needed to make the jump to complex life and his opinion on how unlikely it was. He made a case for how only a relatively small time window was available for it to happen at all.
Day trading is similar. I have even read poker books to help with my day trading. There are tons of knowledge-of-self and life lessons within both.
In this case, I think we have both variance and a cycle. Given the age range of many bigger than life stars, the current cycle is just gearing up. Within that cycle we will have clustering and variance.
Good post. As a male, I have the same issues that you have in your last three paragraphs. I am masculine but do not feel the need or desire to spray alpha maleness constantly. When the pendulum swings back to sales reps having to perform to eat, I think much of that will settle down a bit.
I had a great and likely subsidized Lafite wine in Vegas. The bouquet went into my nose like a tasty explosion filling my entire head. This is even when I had issue with sinusitis. It changed my view of wines forever with one glass. If I find a cheap wine like this...
This is how we did it in cooking school. In fancy steak houses, they have a broiler with specific heat settings for each steak row and standardized steak thickness (always done at 20min mark). The black and blues are put between two cast iron skillets that were upside down on gas burners set on high.
Oddly, I found the headline underwhelming, even if 'may' was not there. I then found that fact overwhelming. Sure, when I think about curing colorblindness, I find a lot of good in it. I just think that on casual passing, I can be desensitized to the awesomeness that I read about every day. That is kind of exciting.
I used flux for a few years and it helps. For me, the glasses were more effective. Maybe because I live with my partner and a light would be flipped on at some point.
It looks like a good start to doing some more serious research, especially the human study. But as I mentioned in a comment, the healthy volunteer study appears to use max daily acceptable intake, which sounds reasonable at first. The amount, however, is the equivalent of 250 packets of sweet and low. That is the sloppy part of the article to me.
Very early in the research, if I am to just go off the article. First, the article really only addresses saccharin. Second, the healthy volunteer study appears to use max daily acceptable intake, which sounds reasonable at first. The amount, however, is the equivalent of 250 packets of sweet and low:
At some point you have to weigh risks and benefits for yourself personally. Sometimes this is due to incomplete information or because it is a grey area issue. You may want to use all cause mortality which says under a drink a day is optimum versus none or more. Or if you are male, you may want higher alcohol consumption due to the heart benefits, where you are of higher risk of a disease that tends to kill earlier than cancer. It is grey area depending on the individual, their genetics, and their wishes, IMO.