437 karma · joined August 25, 2015
dziban.net
https://x.com/dzibanisms
Then a third is an agentic actor that gets access to those other two. That one then has access to two things:
* HTTP requests to specific websites * A limited way to use money
Since you can compose the primitives to limit the impact of any agent doing stupid shit you can trust it more to shop for you or book travel for you.
Of course it's more friction, but you can also choose how involved are you. You can potentially trust your coding agent to do most of it and once done everything that can be deterministic is deterministic, and only agents come in for the non-determinism and adaptability.
As the system evolve you have a library of actors that act as restricted capabilities, and an agent cannot create them out of thin air.
I also built an agentic OS but the underlying system is very different based on a custom actor runtime with capabilities and a way to arbitrarily create and compose restricted capabilities.
The idea is that you can sculpt the OS to your needs using agents and fully restrict what they can or can't do.
The core is also I think kind of interesting because at it's core it's an actor runtime, where each program receives and sends messages, and only when processing a message they use memory. Each program has managed persistent state as well. So it's very easy to create actors that persist data and you can have millions of them without using a lot of resources.
By that logic SpaceX is a German company. Liquid-fuel rocketry was researched and developed at Peenemünde, and the US brought in von Braun's team wholesale to build its program. SpaceX just integrates German IP. Or Google is Swiss. The web was invented at CERN; Google is just an integrator of European tech. Or Apple Silicon is British. ARM was designed in Cambridge; Apple just licenses it.
There is such a wide range of interesting things that can happen here that we aren't exploring at all.
I've been learning Japanese as well and the content at my level is boring while the content I'm interested in is a wall.
Depending on my mental state, status with the person and many other factors each of them may trigger both many different internal thoughts, looks, body expressions and even outcomes.
As an extension of that I've been building a small language to build games (with a nice time traveling debugger and automatic replays) inspired by Elm. Go and Chess are both built on top of this and you could fork them and modify the rules. Want to code a new Chess variant? Go ahead! Want to code a whole new game you want to try? Go ahead!
What I'm very excited with ATProto is that because all games are broadcast on it and each shares a core system of turn-based replays (and review system with branching) software can be built on top to do AI analysis, or a replay view. The idea that my application can be extended without me adding an API is very exciting and very much in the direction I want to take the system (community is the core tenet).
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_%28programming_language%29
I'm pretty sure most of these are just politics being played.
For example:
* German is countable: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/englis... * French is uncountable: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/englis... * American is countable: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/englis... * Spanish is uncountable: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/englis...
But your explanation about why it is correct is bullshit, has nothing to do with "an" vs "a", the English language is just inconsistent as fuck and some demonyms can be used like this and some can't.
Also working on https://www.kinoko.sh/. An agentic engineering platform built from the ground up for agents. Custom language and architecture and a layer of formal verification on top. Also working on a custom inference engine that produces well typed programs
I think by this point everyone that is learning a language knows that immersion is very important, however a problem I've had myself is that the content that interests me is beyond my reach, and the content that is within reach doesn't interest me.
This is my attempt at doing something to remediate that. You select the content you want, and I create a personalized study plan to learn the most important words to achieve a target % of understanding. Then I generate a short story each week for your particular level containing the new words in the context of your content.
The idea is to bring the content you want to learn to your level so you can watch what you want to watch.