I agree on pricing. But it includes 'free' software. Similar model Apple has. You don't buy just hardware.
51 karma · joined June 26, 2025
It's the same. Google translate uses trained AI models.
And another could be EU requirements for age verification. AI can produce adult content.
There are may be other reasons, like to prevent using OAI models' output to train competing models.
Of course, you can go further and run qwen locally. Or even train your own nanogpt. Why not if it's capable, right? And this 'if' is a big question.
Reminds of Biden pardoning his relatives without even saying for what. Just blanked pardon for everything. No democrat dropped his jaw.
Roscosmos? Good joke sir. It's on brink of collapse due to sanctions, management and kremlin's priorities. A ghost from the past.
As for article, imagine, at those times and for thousands years after in most places humans were still hunting-gathering..
As for efficiency, replacing one programmer in group of 10 with AI already will increase productivity and lower the price. In most cases. In reality adding AI accounts to existing group works better. This is _now_, not hopes or sci-fi.
That's why I'm saying there is no way back. 'AI winter' is as likely as smartphones winter.
As for article, imagine, at those times and for thousands years after in most places humans were still hunting-gathering..
Has this been confirmed already? Seems like the 'laws' we know are just an approximation of reality. 2) if none external intervention has been detected it doesn't mean there was none.
Fine details. We are talking about NN model vs algorithm. Both are approximation, and in practice model can fill the gaps in data that algorithm cannon, or does not by default. Good example would be image scaling with in-painting for scratches and damaged parts.
Unfortunately last several millions came for exactly the opposite. Free full government support, aka communism.
Talk for yourself, please. Some humans, yes, can't be trusted even with a fork. There was even a movie about it. But extending it to the whole mankind is a bit of a stretch.
> "open weights + open data + full training details including all data and training recipes"
Is it reproducible?
> respecting opt-out consent of data owners (even retrospectivey)
Were they notified and given an option to opt out? Owners and authors are not the same. Data owners aren't copyright owners either.
> avoiding memorization of training data
Not convincing.
Just wondering would it help to ask it to write to someone else? Because model itself wasn't in its training set, this may be confusing.
It's not simple to even imagine ideal solution. The more you think about it the more complicated your solution becomes. Simple solution will be restricted to your use cases. Generic is either visual or a programming language. I's like to have visual constructor, graph of actions, but it's complicated. The language is more powerful.
The funny thing is this behavior was observed in animals (rats, as they are commonly used in experiments) in labs. So, it's not human specific.
On Mars atmosphere is about 1%, or close. Still helicopter did fly. Correctly saying 'helicopters designed for dense atmosphere cannot fly in thin'.
It is possible to build a drone specifically for these cases. Which will be able to lift 200kg off Everest. With long, wide blades. It's not that expensive and not a rocket science onymore.