MeIam

The main reason that it can't be fixed is that it has political or corporate operators and propaganda bots have taken over. There is always an agenda running through threads of social media even for mundane topics that seeking supremacy.

Even the article itself gives people a pause in order to avoid being blacklisted.

It basically says that they are watching you so you will self censor.

Printers?! Desktop?! They need to wheel the stuff in. Hilarious how far people go to save a few bucks.

- The pandemic did in fact tank the market - Wars never tank the market and they jack up the military industry so no one would have said that - High interest rates did tank the market once last year already and in the past because it provides for risk free gains - Tariffs did tank the market so Trump played the reversal games - Will AI tank the market? It will if it creates unemployment.

Diversifying does not stop the tanking. It will reduce the risk related to poor choices all at once

We don't even know if Times uses AI to get information from other sources either. They can get a hint of news and then produce their material.

So in effect if a lot of people don't get the data now, then it will never matter, is that right?

That logic makes no sense because if they don't get it right now then it does not mean that they will not get it in future.

If Times and its staff can get the text, is all that matters because the use and rate of data usage is not material as it can change any time in future.

Why would that matter, if people didn't use it as much, does it mean that it doesn't matter if there were few people?

Time does not need user logs to prove such a thing if it was true. Times can show that it is possible so they can show how their own users can access the text. Why would they need other user's data?

Wouldn't think that they could use their voice. I had a serious shoulder injury and a surgery an all that. At first I tried my other arm but it would get tired. Voice conversion to text works really well nowadays. Voice to text worked for me.

If people can get the text itself from AI, then anyone can then why would it need access to other people's data?

Does the Times believe that other people can get this text while it can't get it itself? To prove that the AI is stealing the info, Times does not need access to people's logs. All it has to show is that it can get that text.

This sounds like Citizen United again to AstroTurf and gets access to logs with a fake cause.

These AIs have digested all the data in the past. There is no fingerprints anymore.

The question is whether AI itself is aware what the source is. It certainly knows the source.

No, apps can be prevented access. People can be disclosing private information.

So in effect Times has the right to see user's data then.. How do they have the right to take a look at users data?

I looked up the bird..

They are smart!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W7hEUGtv4U

No Alberta will have a war with its aboriginal population as they don't want to join USA.

So you believe threatening to separate is a strategy and that they get more by making threats.

Alberta has oil majority of it foreign owed and wants free pipelines paid by the rest of Canada as subsidy and they got one for free and they believe they get more for free...

This is oil talking and how does oil talk? Via oil companies. Americans own a lot of oil in Alberta. Americans are Astroturfing. They do it at home and abroad and that is how Citizen United produced corporate personhood in USA.

If Alberta wants to separate and it's native people/aboriginals who own much of the land, don't go along, are they going to go to war?

Your trade deals are a flash in history. Native Aboriginal Canadians do not owe anything to oil traders south of the border. You can't force them join your ghettos.