1,833 karma · joined June 30, 2012
I knew .NET's array variance rules were kinda bad, but that's really surprising.
[1] https://github.com/mozilla/TTS [2] https://github.com/coqui-ai/TTS/tree/e9e07844b77a43fb0864354...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/...
> The person who prepares this form states that he or she is the person, executor, guardian, authorized officer, or agent of the person for whom mail would be forwarded under this order. Anyone submitting false or inaccurate information on this form is subject to punishment by fine or imprisonment or both under Sections 2, 1001, 1702, and 1708 of Title 18, United States Code.
> Human CO2 emissions matter precisely because the math has exceeded change from natural causes.
Why? It's the significant detrimental impact of the human activity that's important, not how it compares to the amount or change from natural causes. (It doesn't even matter that it's human activity. If Earth were going to become inhospitable by entirely natural causes, that would still matter.)
> then maybe you might have a case.
I'm not making the case that wind turbines are harming the environment; that's just the example at hand. I'm making the case that casually dismissing (questions about) the potential impact of human activities is wrong.
There seems to have been a lot of extreme weather in recent years. Could it be because harvesting energy from the wind alters weather patterns? A lot of people would rather just blame it on global warming than ask a question that might expose a flaw in our plans to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.
We need to have bit more humility and a bit less dogma about what we "know".
If you want to recover metals from garbage, it's much easier if you burn it rather than bury it.
It literally does. I'm using it on Android 12. Far from "not functioning", it has the most reliable IMAP IDLE support of any Android app that I've tried.
> The signature counter is a strictly monotonic counter and the intent is that a relying party can record the values and so notice if a private key has been duplicated, as the strictly-monotonic property will eventually be violated if multiple, independent copies of the key are used.
> There are numerous problems with this, however. Firstly, recall that CTAP1 tokens have very little state in order to keep costs down. Because of that, all tokens that I’m aware of have a single, global counter shared by all keys created by the device. [...] This means that the value and growth rate of the counter is a trackable signal that’s transmitted to all sites that the token is used to login with.
> Update: It looks like Amazon is converting the uploaded EPUB to KF8 (AZW3). So, it looks like they might not support EPUB natively.
So I'm not holding my breath. Which is not to say Amazon couldn't add native EPUB support. KF8/AZW3[1] (Amazon's proprietary ebook format) is basically EPUB in a MOBI shell. But they're moving away from KF8 to KFX[2] for books purchased from the Amazon store.
[1] https://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/KF8 [2] https://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/KFX
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979#section-3.2
The US system is intentionally designed so that you don't know what the IRS does or does not know. If you leave something off of your taxes that the IRS knows about then maybe they'll audit you and give you a big fine. So the optimal strategy is to report everything and pay the taxes you owe.
In Spain's system, it seems to me that the optimal strategy would be to either go with what the tax agency says or to report more information, depending in which gives you a lower tax bill.
> To read in binary, you open with 'rb' and not just 'r'.
No. "The default translation mode is 'b'." [1] And even in 't' mode, it's still reading bytes in PHP vs UCS-2 characters in C#.
* The C# version invokes EndOfStream up to 4096 times for every 1 call to feof in PHP version.
* The C# version opens the file in text mode (and thus does UTF-8 decoding) whereas the PHP version opens the file in binary mode.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20110429023658/http://www.google...
Of course, Google later removed this clause from the ToS.
This has been rectified, by the way.
Consider cash:
> There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise.
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Currency/Pages...
It is, of course, a bit different since cash, check, and credit are all denominated in dollars, whereas Bitcoin is denominated in Bitcoin.