8,182 karma · joined September 26, 2009
§103 is being removed, a paragraph that had a useful existence when it was easy to start a war by insulting a foreign head.
The "right to offend" is not being instated however, as §185 (law against insults) still exists and won't be removed, as it serves as a useful outlet for insulted people other than e.g. violence.
That said, missiles with proximity detonation only make sense if they're actually built to be fragmentation weapons, not pure explosive-based, due to explosion shockwaves being useless in space thanks to a lack of medium to travel in. And even for fragmentation they'd need to get really close due to inverse square law.
The best solution for almost every response he got is: Introduce better legislation. Even charities are just bandaids over actual problems.
And the lesson he learned from that: Don't stick to the rules too closely, but also try to see if breaking some rules can have positive side effects. Experiment.
Not a fun read. Very badly written as he constantly leaves out the consequences and details of decisions and circumstances, or only mentions them paragraphs later.
You have a german username so i guess you're german too. Try to point out what's as weird in german as having to wonder in english how to even write a word just from the sounds.
I find it quite superficial to call the new movie a love letter just because a number of stills have similar elements in them.
As an example: In the water fight scene the anime has a LOT of story-telling with her actions being clearly based on high level moral motivations, as well as observations of and adaption to the progression of the fight itself. Every action taken has a reason and nuance behind it, based on who and what her adversary is as well as the tactical situation. In the movie it's a straight-up beat-down of an almost entirely unresponsive puppet.
I tried to be nice to you because what you said was ambiguous, period. But i guess if that's how you react then you deserve those downvotes.
With only a little bit of investigation, or even participation, it quickly becomes entirely clear that compos divide entries by hardware, and people in the demoscene don't ask oldschool 64ks to measure up to PC 64ks.
I recommend having a look at the various compo blocks on pouet: https://www.youtube.com/user/RevisionParty
Encouraging children to ask why is not only the most kind thing you can do for them, but also the rest of the world.
Maybe they'll figure something out.
They did fix that though, i think.
And i think you're right about archeology. Most of the notable people mentioned in the history section of wikipedia are english.
Defaulting anything they should ordinary label as "purpose unknown" to "religious".
> How long have you been doing it?
Claiming that i am jumping to conclusions is ridiculous. I started the first post by saying i already thought my initial thought may have been doing that, and stated it as a feeling (subjective), and thus positioned it not as an objective fact but a hypothesis, inviting discussion. I was earnest, honest and clear. You're just being gracelessly sarcastic and dishonest.
Also, the show this app is based on is accessible to an international audience.
Also, if it's not that, where does that aspect come from then? How long have archeologists been doing this?
It's nice that a handful of people are being helped, but they are utterly dwarved by the amounts of people in the same situation who won't ever receive help, not because it's impossible (other countries do it fine) but because the country refuses to recognize the needs of all of its citizens.
It works fine.