30 karma · joined April 3, 2025
30% of the work we did seemed to have value - but that was with a relatively targeted and preset set of questions to answer. It always felt as if someone higher up said, "let's get this data in shape to use for analysis" but never had any questions to ask of that data to begin with. I suspect that if LLMs can truly understand complex interactions across a multitude of datasets, the context within those interactions, along with dozens of exceptions, then it can be of use.
"When a group of libertarians set about scrapping their local government, chaos descended. And then the bears moved in." [1]
[1] https://newrepublic.com/article/159662/libertarian-walks-int...
These are kids. The sigh in this article is because kids would rather feel safe than be the bullied or made to feel lesser-than for an adult's ideological worship of free speech? Perhaps we can acknowledge that while free speech in the context of government censorship is necessary, it is certainly not the end-all-be-all for children socializing.
It seems like there is such a disconnect from basic humanity with so many reason.com writers.
The believe that US manufacturing will rise to the occasion is specious at best, and I would say that the amount of uncertainty with this administration makes it even less likely. Why would any large firm invest in creating a local supply when tomorrow the tariffs could be lifted - or some other wild unknown introduced for no real reason?
I suspect that many will be dragged into more pernicious mental health issues, while a lucky few will take it as a sign to disconnect more.