3,989 karma · joined October 17, 2015
Note: My username was literally something cool I thought of in 2015 while bored in a cubicle farm. Fascinating concept, but please consider it just a username.
A lot of American universities are scrambling for every international student they can get because they pay the most.
I agree with the author, this makes the entire Valve review system pointless.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/07/us/politics/classified-do...
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation wrote about it https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-russia-military-leaks-...
One of the first reactions from the government and Ukraine was that this was all Russian disinformation. Then within a couple of days other media sources weighed in and there was considerable debate, until this guy was identified.
So yes. Many people have hypothesized this was Russian disinformation.
Here's two more: Al Jazerra: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/4/10/us-scrambles-to-fin...
and NBC: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-...
A comparison is the purchase of a vehicle. In 21 states, the manufacture of a vehicle can sell directly to the consumer. In the rest of the states, the law says that a manufacture is for bidden from selling directly to consumers. Yet people buy cars and bring them across state lines, all the time, whether they purchased it from the manufacturer or a dealer. If the point of sale occurs outside of Colorado, and John Deere has no corporate presents in Colorado, then I don't see how this is applicable.
How enforceable is this? John Deere could say no, we're not going to provide any of these to Colorado since they are an Illinois company. Colorado would have to go after John Deere but.. who would be the focal point of that enforcement? John Deere retailers?
It's possible they might just pull out of Colorado... I don't see how Colorado could enforce this against a company HQ'd in Illinois.
Americans seem very enthusiastic about telling everyone else what they should do about an issue, but as soon as it effects them in any way, it becomes Not In My Backyard or just "not my problem."
The real issue is that they don't pay anything for the spectrum use.
Serious question: If it was on the other shoe, would most people have remained on bail all this time to have two children after what Elizabeth Holmes did?
I think NPR would be very upset if the government required political neutrality as part of its funding.
Interesting, why polyester?