Petersipoi

You hate LLM writing, so you took human written words and ran them through an LLM to read it?

Hate to break it to you, but you don't hate LLM writing.

> when the core editor is almost unusable

Shit, as someone who uses Zed everyday, I didn't realize what I am using is unusable.

The second China shuts down open weights is the second they lose the AI race. Nobody is going to use Chinese models if they're closed, besides hobbyists who don't have anything they care about getting stolen.

Something about your comment comes across as AI to me. I can't really place my finger on it. It's too subtle for that. It's more the vibe of your entire comment that makes me feel it.

Please, when commenting on HN, don't use AI to write your comments. You can afford to help keep this a human-centric place.

The fact that Star Wars like droids seem to be likely within our lifetime is WILD. It's crazy how normal everyone is acting about this.

The idea that AI curing cancer, heart disease, aging (you get the idea) won't be a money maker because "clinical trials" is absurd. Of course it will be. Obviously it isn't the same thing as coding agents. But a lot of money makers aren't the same things as coding agents.

It says right at the top of the website:

> From the pin, a filled 5° slice in every direction. Petal length = distance to 100k people.

Why is it relevant what those outside would say about the US? Or what those outside of any country would say about any country. The job of a country is to do what is best for it. It's better for the US to not help China develop AI that surpasses its own capabilities. It's better for China to try anyway. There are many countries inventing nothing with loud opinions. Those opinions are completely irrelevant to China or the US.

There are many reasons for a lot of things, until you overcome those reasons. That's the point of innovation. There are many reasons not to make a reusable rocket too.

Did you not read the comment thread you're responding to?

AI model inspects hundreds of thousands of scientific images. A job that previously took an expert roughly a month can now be completed in around 15 minutes.

Why not? Seems like a cop out.

Being able to ask questions to small open models seems.... obviously useful?

As someone on the Apple beta.. the model is almost completely irrelevant to the experience. Apple has gone and done Apple things by nerfing the experience so completely that almost any model in the past year would be fine. I still reach for ChatGPT/Claude/Grok constantly instead of the AI toy that Apple calls the new Siri.

Nothing you said here can't be applied to literally any company on earth. And nothing you said here is even a new concern.

People have been saying this since GPT-1. This idea that we can only squeeze a little bit more of intelligence out of LLMs isn't a new one. And thus far, it has always been wrong.

Even if your outburst was true, yes.. If your government turns rogue it's better to have 2 options than 1. Period.

As opposed to the incredible code that humans are known to write...

Why lol? Because you don't like Elon? XAI has continued to stay within a few months of leading edge, and now suddenly they'll just never do it again, despite doing it literally today?

On the contrary, that is what happens if I use Claude

This comment says more about your misunderstanding of the world than anything about X

People will truly justify anything. My god. We can't even hold governments accountable for waste because people will bend over backwards to justify any amount of spending.

It's funny how "trump" dwarfs just about any other term. Truly a hacker forum.

So many people on HN don't understand coding with AI at all. I honestly think they just haven't done it. AI does not take the grind out of coding. Plain and simple. I've been working on a project in the evening for months with AI. Yet there are people on HN that think one-shotting a pong game is the same thing.

> don't want to be struck by anything i didn't hear coming

Airpods Pro with transparency mode is the best for this

If the claim is true that Claude values white people less than other races, then yes.

Any other softball questions?

Sprinting requires significantly different physical form than just bigger motors. I do not accept the claim that humans couldn't possibly make bipedal robots that can reliably walk without being able to sprint. That's absurd.

No, it's a test of how good an AI is at completing this given task. You can't extrapolate beyond that, and that is what makes this article so annoying. Grok got good at the task that was given. That doesn't mean that Grok is going to use the same strategy if given an entirely different task. Grok obviously didn't need collaboration to win, as made evident by the fact that it won without collaboration. Anyone who is claiming that Grok wouldn't collaborate if it was beneficial is just guessing.

You're mistaking a CEO claiming layoffs are a result of AI with layoffs actually being a result of AI.

In other words, if I were a CEO that needed to do layoffs, I'd blame them on AI. Because why the fuck wouldn't I? It's practically a get out of jail free card right now. The big bad AI is the villain, not me!

Because if you call something a right, then anyone who disagrees with you is a fascist. It's simple.

What?

You want Apple to anonymize a users data, then hand that users data to a third party who knows who the user is? I don't think PCC is doing what you think it's doing.