902 karma · joined October 31, 2008
email: hackernews dut pistos aet purepistos dut net
open source: http://github.com/Pistos
When developing new Ruby stuff, one thing to watch for is interoperability with old gems that are not 1.9-ready. But the good news is, most gems work just fine under 1.9 -- at least in the non-Rails world. I think I recall only one or two gems I tried to use that weren't updated to work with 1.9 yet, out of many that I use or discovered.
Good work; show me more (I subscribed).
In addition to that, I recently adjusted my fork of RVM[1] to work with Gentoo again (installed and managed systemwide as root, with users read-only).
Also, for the past week or two, I've been helping with RDBI[2], a new project aiming to be to database access what Rack is to web servers and web frameworks.
Roadblocks: Human nature. But grace overcomes that.
As such, I would say it's not unreasonable to wait for the drowning person to lose consciousness if you aren't confident you could prevent or deal with him or her dragging you down.
Example scenario (based on a real life occurrence, as related by my instructor): You approach an indoor pool, and see what looks to be a child floating face down in the water, and an adult also floating similarly nearby. Your first instinct might be to dive in to save one or both of them, but a subtle clue is present: while the child is in swimming attire, the adult is in street clothes. In actual fact, a live wire has somehow come to be in contact with the water -- the adult had dived in to try to save the child, but was electrocuted.
Visible drivers; car damage (open doors, crunched and torn fenders); breathtaking scenery; visible light from cars (on road, on dust clouds); driver's seat views (dash, steering wheel, rear view mirror, etc.).
I completely agree that there should be a better, direct way to test cron jobs.
Usually with these things, once you have your idea, it's just a matter of filling in the blanks. To quote from the movie Amadeus: "The rest is just scribbling."
You should clarify what you meant by the above.
(a) "You... [do] not recognize that religion [in general] is intrinsically violent." (b) "You... [do] not recognize that [that particular] religion[, Islam,] is intrinsically violent."