Ian run a legit site, not phishing, so what's perfect in revoking his EV cert and not giving back cash?
192 karma · joined January 17, 2018
[Verifying my OpenPGP key: openpgp4fpr:c6045c813887b77c2dff97a57c56acfe947897d8]
Ian run a legit site, not phishing, so what's perfect in revoking his EV cert and not giving back cash?
You probably refer to the "old websocket" spec, new websockets are working well: https://prosody.im/doc/modules/mod_websocket
Why can't these services use something like OpenPGP's Web Key Discovery [0] fetching key from https://domain.com/.well-known/openpgp/hu/hash-for-localpart and avoid links altogether?
[0]: https://www.gnupg.org/blog/20160830-web-key-service.html
Fanatics of any kind always remind of this fragment of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance:
> You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt.
Isn't it possible to migrate phone number between carriers in US?
[0]: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/03/clipboarda...
Could you provide a source for this?
fetch('../out/main.wasm').then(response =>
response.arrayBuffer()
).then(bytes => WebAssembly.instantiate(bytes))
could be expressed as this: fetch('../out/main.wasm').then(response =>
WebAssembly.instantiateStreaming(response))
[0]: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/01/making-webassembly-even-fa...[0]: https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2017/09/13/verified-crypto...
Well I think most companies need stronger guarantees than "[probably] never be caught".
Exactly. Using a separate build host makes builds more independent but on the other hand you'll be running images that the dev did not check.
By the way, are docker image identifiers derived from the actual contents? (Are they reproducible?)
This would suggest they are not:
> Docker images are non-reproducible: each "layer" identifier is a random hex string (and not cryptographic hash of the layer content),
Source: https://blog.bazel.build/2015/07/28/docker_build.html
But this is a very simple alternative, distributed "Twitter" for hackers: https://github.com/buckket/twtxt#twtxt
Another thing, in a make_post_response stub function I think it's better to use StatusCode::NotImplemented instead of NotFound (when trying this code I thought the match did not work correctly as everything returned NotFound).
Do you e-mails end with @idp.gluu.org? Or how would the RP discover that the domain is not "gluu.org" but "idp.gluu.org"?
Bad news: they're checking if consumers/developers would pay to have Linux on a smartphone :-/
The only true solution is to use your own domain and then, if possible, delegate to hosted server. If the provider does something that you don't like you just change provider or host your own. And one's @gmail.com address will always be hosted by Google.
Could you elaborate on this? Or provide some references? This sounds interesteing but when I tried DDG and Google for "smalltalk undefined paradoxes" the results were not exactly satisfactory.