1,129 karma · joined August 6, 2007
http://fangamer.com/
rofish [ATTT} rofish {PERIOD] net
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/rofish; my proof: https://keybase.io/rofish/sigs/MVUdgZzLZVU2wEGqAyMWJmSo14lUFBbdb7R-tGDZDuY ]
I know my Google Analytics aren't 100% correct, but I don't think people are spoofing them. The differences lie more in people who click through faster than GA can load (which can be easily possible on those still on 56k), or have "privacy blockers" in their ad block to remove GA altogether.
This is the fault of the shipper, not the postal service.
Allowing simple iOS protocol handlers like "square://pay?product1=Mug&price1=20.00&product2=Shirt&price2=22.00&callback=inventorify%3A%2F%2Fsquare_callback" and it callsback to url "inventorify://square_callback?success=true&paid=42.00" would be amazing as I don't have to have the awkward step of "Exit the inventorify app and charge the customer for $42.00 through the Square app" and then the cashier forgets the amount to charge for.
Right now I'm in "wait and see" mode where I don't want to invest in the iPad 2 unless I know for sure that Hulu will still be able to function.
The thing that boils my britches about this is that Apple DOESN'T have a competing service. When the services leave, the iPhone is left only with iBooks and iTunes, both of which are expensive and not very good.
Coincidentally, I've never had such a problem with Paypal. (My gripes with them generally revolve around the glacially slow history search.)
IANAL, but it appears that simply having a "question and answer" site doesn't apply to this patent. If you read the patent, it's mostly related to the idea of asking a question costs points and giving the best answer, as chosen by the asker, receives points.
Any variation on this scheme, such as a general moderator or the public via voting choses the best answer, or not having the asker assign points to a question to be received (avoid the economy, still have asker chose best answer) can avoid this patent.