ReflectedImage

This is a conservative problem.

Conservatives are split into 2 groups. Conservatives who are in it for the money and conservatives who are in it because they don't know any better.

College professor is not a well paying job for the level of skill required nor is it a job that someone who isn't very knowledgeable could do. That excludes most conservatives from the position.

Ahh the bad high school maths take, which doesn't account for the risk.

People don't just build 1 thing for a house nor can they afford a $20k failure.

If you take Fred who saves up $10k for a major purchase for his house each year.

If there is a 10% chance of a failure, then Fred will have a 53% chance of bankruptcy in 7 years.

You can't run an economy where everyone is bankrupt.

The concept of a module comes from the concept of a service. Services have small public interfaces that conceal their private internal workings.

I understand it's a very surprising thing to learn.

But if they hadn't been flouted, the US would be a dirt farm specializing in the farming and production of dirt. Hacker news wouldn't even exist.

Procedure, functional and Entity Component Systems (Sketchpad, 1963) programs came first.

Micro-services then came along (Distributed computing).

Then OOP was then invented to replicate the benefits of micro-services in single user environments.

Of course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo84LFzx5nI

So originally software development used micro-services rather than modules. A lot of software developers get this wrong and think modules were first. They were not. The software developers just grew up during the module fad caused by the personal computer before everything circled back around to micro-services.

The purpose of OOP was to replicate the benefits of micro-services in single user environments. A class corresponds to a service type and an object an physical instance of the service.

So why did Monoliths/modules fail? Some pretty simple issues, incomplete isolate between the modules, memory corruption and performance issues easily propagate between the "isolated" modules.

But the main killer is compile times. Monoliths/module based programs require massive compile times that grow quickly with the size of the program.

Python is popular because of it's expansive ecosystem of libraries, which only exist because the language is duck typed. If it was statically typed, the expansive ecosystem of libraries wouldn't exist.

There is a factor of 3x difference in dev speed between the two typing systems.

Arguably, it's a step in the wrong direction. Share memory by communicating is already doable in Python with Pipe() and Queue() and side steps the issue entirely.

As a general rule of thumb, once you have proper tests, static typing doesn't find very much, if anything.

It will now be used as a vehicle for an overly complex pyramid scheme.

Well at least this will eventually clear EA out from the market.

Basically, fascism creates a system where people are promoted based on political loyalty rather than competency.

The most loyal people will be the people who lack skill since they only have the position due to the higher ups ensuring loyalty.

Rust is basically the wanted fixes to C++ that C++ itself could never adopt for legacy reasons.

So I'm afraid no by definition C++ can't adopt Rust's ideas because Rust's ideas were originally impossible C++ ideas.

No saying negative things about the next Dot com bubble! I still have shares to cash out and bags to move onto the general public.

If you are just looking to get pass the age check: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU9K1LsgX7c

will do it.

"Very soon" is last year in this case

That already exists: https://huggingface.co/spaces/fffiloni/expression-editor

Really? Because 50% of the UK wealth is in the hands of billionaires. So everyone in the country would suddenly be twice as wealthy (excluding the billionaires of course).

Perhaps you should check the facts before making statements like that!

Whilst generative AI is great for writing business letters and essays and all that, going straight for coding, one of, if not the hardest problem is a bit much.

This is a come back in 5 years when it works sort of thing.

Minimal Viable Product obtained!

Sadly the authors of LibreLingo were last seen being lead into the back of a white van by an enormous green owl

Well the problem is best stated as "I don't know how to use channels and I don't intend to learn". So perhaps some kinda of developer education is the solution?

Absolutely terrible.

The foundations of economics are built on school boy style maths errors.

They have famous "paradoxes" and results that are just bad maths.

It's a ridiculous joke of a research field.

Well it's positive for various countries that benefit from an end to US dominance over the world. :p

So for the US itself? The theory would be that the tariffs will increase US manufacturing sector. But the cold hard truth is that it isn't the 1830s anymore and last time tariffs were tried happened to line up exactly with the Great Depression.

Even an competent administration would have great difficulty making tariffs to restore manufacturing work in the US, if that is even at all possible. It fails because other countries just put the same tariffs back on the US.

So with the Trump's administration some kinda of serious economy meltdown is almost certainly the result.

Well China's economy is currently tied up in a housing pyramid scheme that's gone burst.

Russia's economy is on such a war footing regardless of if it wins or losses in Ukraine, the economic shock of the end of the war will bankrupt the country. See Dutch disease.

And no one wants to host the Olympics, it's a huge money sink.

So it doesn't really pay, it's just bankrupts you. Even Trump's America is having massive stock sell offs and other countries dumping the dollar.

They already wasted $500M in loss of perishable goods. So a "saving" of -$492 million so far.

Well Trump bankrupted his casinos and Elon Musk turned twitter from a break even company into one that loses money every year.

Now, it's time for their double act of economic ruination for the US.

Golang's standard library looks pretty complete to me and they will probably master it in a month.

That's part of the point it's from the software engineering viewpoint of preferring simpler typing systems rather than the academic viewpoint of preferring more complex typing systems.

"as a general rule, large established codebases produce 90% of the value."

This is only until your new upstart competitor comes along, rewrites your codebase from scratch and runs you out of the market with higher development velocity (more features).