If I purchased a stick of 32GB DDR4 RAM from you for $100, am I now not in $100 debt to you? We are private parties - can you refuse to accept a legal $100 and force me into paying you by Zelle?
109 karma · joined December 26, 2019
I'm also interested what this "entity in charge" does? and why would it do anything at all?
In hindsight.
> Google stock _never_ settled down
What do you mean? Are there periods of time you can point out that I can study?
So VR birdwatching works, or no?
Remember, if VR birdwatching works, then you can now watch small, fast-moving animals that exhibit specific combinations of behaviors at any time of the year from the comfort of your couch and thus, the benefits of birdwatching can be enjoyed by a much larger population.
In other words, if its shown that people who eat jawbreakers have good teeth, is it possible that the underlying reason for it is you simply cannot eat jawbreakers with dentures?
> Money is a medium of exchange
That's an oversimplification. It comes with a lot of rules and authority that will be enforced by the issuing authority that a simple "IOU" on a sheet of paper lacks. IN the continental US, you cannot refuse to accept a dollar note. You certainly can refuse to accept the very IOU we agreed on a minute earlier.
Most of the developed world already has magical genies - certainly an overwhelming majority of people on HN earn enough to have LLM subs that build code, 3D Printers that print physical things.
The challenge always has been and will be humans.
You just cannot live in a vacuum. If you could subsist entirely on cheetos and figured out how to make an entire lifetime's supply of cheetos, after N days of watching Netflix, arguing on HN, raising chickens and goats, one day you will want to go and talk to a human.
Soon after, you will need a currency.
Of course, the root cause being people who are unfit, sick or elderly cannot literally make it up a flight of stairs.
but if people aren't paying attention, like the vast majority of population dont, you'll suddenly have an explosion of condos that start from the 5th floor with the first 4 floors turned into something else.
and all of them have lifts!
If a article headlines saying "People who wake up early live 20 years longer than people who sleep in", and then it turns out it wasn't the act of waking up early at all, rather, early risers then went out for a run or a swim and people who slept in but did the same actually lived even longer than those early risers, it's important to know that.
Or are the hiking, breathing in fresh air, the eyes seeing natural sunlight etc critical to the effects?
So if I swapped the birdwatching with watching horses run or pigs fornicate with everything else being the same (hiking, breathing in fresh air, the eyes seeing natural sunlight etc), I would enjoy the exact same benefits the article claims birdwatching results in?
because they don't control the physical paper that is money.
I dont understand what you mean by "fiat tokens". I don't imagine most people will accept tokens as a currency because they are as good hold of value and predictable as bitcoin.
In a token economy, certainly what you say is a possibility, but as you can imagine, that economy will be unsustainable so back to "regular" money.
I know it sounds and feels like the only trajectory of this company is up but HN is an echo chamber of a tiny minority of the technical populace and 3 out of 5 people on the planet don't know what ChatGPT is.
If you have the ability to lose all the money and can time the extreme volatility, have fun, but don't put anything you're going to rely on.
This is also one of the companies we will look back at 2046 and wonder what we were thinking.
Agreed and a great manager won't cause burnout because they fundamentally understand what the expectations of their employees are!
I explained a bit of this in my root comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39809297
Curious to hear what your thoughts are
Likely the job as in the management - I explained their role in my root comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39809297
Curious to hear what your thoughts are
Well done! I explained this paradox in my root comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39809297
Curious to hear what your thoughts are
If you got paid $250k/yr to work fulltime at Bain and all that work was to shred a single piece of paper, any paper, a day and that is it, no crunch time, no yelling bosses, nothing - would you eventually burn out?
1. What could be causing that?
2. What are the chances of this same behavior happening at a Fortune 500000?
3. How would an employee detect that behavior, potentially as early as when interviewing for the job?
1. Did your find doing the "developer work" itself fulfilling in the first place?
2. If given a choice between your management position and the "developer work", which one would you pick?
3. If you could go back in time and redo everything, would you have started off in management to begin with?
4. What would you have done differently?
I ask these questions because I have a hypothesis that you currently work for bad management and that made the developer work really unfulfilling in part because it gave you no to little agency over your impact. By moving into part of the management layer you got some agency over your impact and managed to disassociate yourself from the unfulfilling developer work, but I would like to learn more from you directly
If focusing on engineering, technical, programming, and math problems is really what excites you and you truly have no interest in the business side of things, you should start looking for companies that will only want you to focus on engineering, technical, programming, and math problems and there are a lot of them out there.
If your current place of work complains you “lack” an eye for the bigger picture, and that might be true, that means they dont have good management at all, because a good manager would immediately understand what you value and align you with that or ask you to leave explictly if that's not what they wanted.
Bad management takes no initiative and lack critical decision making skills, stay away.
I think you're conflating skill and ability with impact and expectations.
Early on in your life, your expectations could have been to gain tremendous skill and grow your abilities. You probably didn't care that much if your work went into the trash because in the process, you learned some extremely important and valuable skills. That journey itself made it all worth it and met your expectations.
Over time, as you become more skillful and able, your expectations could change to seeing your work having real impact on the world instead.
This is perhaps, to you, now there's marginal return on being even more skillful and able. You ask "what's the end goal and did I reach it?"
> risk being disappointed once more. Maybe this time, you will be able to recognize it before it's "too late". I don't know
I mentioned in my own comment, the root cause of burnout - be it coding or otherwise, is when expectations don't match reality.
If you're a developer, your impact and outcome is beholden to management, so even through you might not realize it, part of your jobsearch now has to focus on ensuring you detect great management - and you make it a part of your interview to locate them.
The real solution to not being burned out: work with a team that actually knows what they are doing and have strong fundamentals.
As I mentioned in my own comment, the root cause of burnout - be it coding or otherwise, is when expectations don't match reality.
For most people, especially the young, they attach their expectations to the job and work they do. There are also a certain number of people who have other expectations though - like how they can contribute to charity or the well-being of their own family from the money they make, from a job they don't necessarily like or even care about. One example is the popular Bain/McKinsey partner who is happy to sell absolute vaporware that will never be delivered ever, because they don't care whether their customers are happy - their own expectations are how bigger of a yatch or mansion they can upgrade to next year.
It all boils down to what the expectations are and whether they match reality.
In most cases, people want to do meaningful work and see their work having real impact on the world.
If you spent all your waking hours, eating ramen all the while, building something that has outsized impact on the world, you won't be burnt out - quite the opposite!
OTOH, you can even get burnt out doing almost nothing all day, getting paid six figures if your work got thrown away into the trash can regularly (had no impact at all on anyone).
Burnout happens when that expectation doesn't match reality.
> these companies just sound like another high-performance meat grinder
> but are constantly under scrutiny. And smaller companies are all going pseudo-agile to try to squeeze every last ounce from their developers
As bad it sounds, high-performance, being under scrutiny, squeeze every last ounce aren't really the root cause of burnout - these are great symptoms of a broken process that leads to unmet expectations that then causes burnout.
The broken process usually are:
Scenario 1: At big company, BigCo, your work rarely has a direct impact on the customer, or when it does, it could have been years since you actually made the change that makes it way to the customer if it ends up that route at all or you have no way of getting customer feedback.
Result: You question yourself whether working so hard or putting in that overtime was really worth it because you have no idea where that effort ended up
Scenario 2: Someone ambitious, NewGun, at BigCo figured out a shortcut to a promotion - build a new product which is "better, faster" than an existing product CashCow. BigCo is too afraid to make major changes to CashCow (because it is the cash cow) and there's already a layer of management that's known to steward CashCow. NewGun is an outsider so even if NewGun pulled off those major changes to CashCow, they won't get most of the recognition - the CashCow stewards will.
Action: NewGun convinces BigCo to give them a bunch of devs, works them to the bone (because they need results yesterday), skips actual customer research and discovery (because that takes too long and they need results yesterday), makes up usecases and fictitious users
Result: Product flops badly because it doesn't appeal to anyone real. Devs question themselves whether working so hard or putting in that overtime was really worth it
Scenario 3: This is a very close cousin of Scenario 2, except that NewGun is a fresh entrepreneur who convinced some investors to give them money. Result is the same
Micromanagement, scrutiny, squeeze every last ounce are all symptoms of bad management. They by themselves aren't a strong differentiator - great management can do scrutiny, squeezing as well when it's tactically critical, but that's the exception, like pulling the handbrake to avoid an accident, than the norm.
The real solution to not being burned out: work with a team that actually knows what they are doing and have strong fundamentals. How do find those teams is perhaps a separate post as this one's way too long already
Not the OP but this would really help
Happy to create an issue if this is a new request or upvote if there's an existing request
Integration with Google Meet, Zoom would really help.
I see plugins for both but could never get them to work (teams edition though)
The expectation is that, just like on slack, I should be able to do a slash command and have a Google Meet or Zoom meeting ready to join
The reality is people claim to need E2EE but it's not worth paying extra for it.
It's kind of like how people nod when you ask them if they hate companies like FB/GOOG stealing their personal information and then you offer them a dollar to give your their DOB, Address and SSN and they happily take the dollar and share all of that info.
… and those really serious about E2EE are using their custom stack anyways.
have you tried running it using Mattermost team (the OSS) instance?
I also use their cloud instance to stay updated on new features but voice is a paid only plan, so couldn't check it out
This is fantastic news!
It is/was a problem having to choose which server to connect to, when I had multiple Mattermost servers.
This new feature will fix that quandary
Different Question: can I point `mmctl` to your managed cloud instance (are the "free tiers" exempt from this ability but paid tiers allow this?), have it create a backup and restore that backup to a local Mattermost team (the OSS) instance? This is just to be able to migrate old team chats off the Mattermost cloud instance but retain the ability to quickly read them now and then if needed
True!
Why is that, though?
Like - do the great leaders retire quick?
Or is it that we are just an unlucky bunch who get exposed to bad leadership?
Makes sense. I asked this question because I have been getting feedback from some managers (technical and non-technical) that good writers translate to good programmers, but I couldn't find any evidence/whitepaper/quality discussion on that
the risk being that the new boss takes the autonomy away from you (and much more)