More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26329791
A few other comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26339162
Steven Galbraith's criticism: https://twitter.com/EllipticKiwi/status/1367322432571240450
22,823 karma · joined November 18, 2008
I'm interested in math, programming, physics, science, engineering, technical communication, and cool stuff. I travel a lot in the UK and elsewhere, and it would be cool to meet up.
Happy to receive emails anytime.
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26329791
A few other comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26339162
Steven Galbraith's criticism: https://twitter.com/EllipticKiwi/status/1367322432571240450
Imagine a group of cishet men saying : "I'm off to the strip club to see a bunch of guys taking their clothes off and dancing in a provocative manner."
Does that seem reasonable? If not, then the term "guys" is gendered.
On top of that, most of the women I know feel that "guys" is a term that excludes them. That's enough for me to avoid using it.
I sent the results to Paul Graham, who said I should submit them to HN, of which I'd never heard. I did so, and they pretty much sunk without trace, as do so many of my submissions. Even so, I read some more, and stayed for a while.
[0] http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html
[1] https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PaulGrahamEssays.html?HNrj06
[2] https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PaulGrahamEssaysRanking.html?...
So, well, RiderOfGiraffes.
Still, given my username I should add something ...
So if the size was prime x prime then the fact that the number of bits is a semi-prime tells you the size of the image, even if all you have is a stream of digits. Then the "noise" at the end will tell you what the least significant bits are, and hence you get an image without very much ambiguity.
Just thought I'd mention that.
A variable is a single name and is the simplest example of an expression that is an l-value.
If you want to see previous discussions of this material, a good link is this one:
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Vannevar%20Bush&sort=byDate&da...
Having said all that, I hope this gets some new discussion.
The result was announced some 6 years ago, and there was a long discussion about it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1587340
It was submitted again three years ago with another lengthy discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7374994
The other submissions had no discussion:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3921215 (1689 days ago)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1606717 (2315 days ago)
I come from an age when everything was cool, fun, exciting, and everyone played nice. Email didn't have to be secured, messages could be sent directly to terminals, and commands could be executed without worrying that people would strip your machine, take your details, empty your bank account, and turn it into a spam relay.
Where are the security details?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11719543 (157 comments)
Other submissions, some with a comment or two, here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11754074
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11725991
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11723319
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11715677
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11713454
Masters (equivalent) and PhD at Cambridge University, UK.
http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PaulGrahamEssays.html
I haven't updated that in ages - not sure I still have the code for it.
I send a link to that to PG, and he said I should submit it to HN.
So I did.
Original: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=368657
Revisited: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=397408
Wow. 2008/11/18. Over 7 years ago.
I've found several typos and other grammatical issues, and I'd love to be able to provide quick fixes for them. It's of no real value to me, but I've got something from the article, and I'd be happy to give back a small amount of time to help make it a little better.
But I have to register, check my email, use the password sent to me in plain-text, login, re-load, find the comment box, and then start typing. It's almost like they don't want comments.
But without hurdles like this a blog is quickly over-whelmed with spam, and other even less savoury material. I have an idea as to how to solve this, but I don't have the time to acquire the necessary skills to implement it, and don't really care enough to bother. And so the world remains more broken than it need be.
Which I find disappointing.
One word: Tufte.
Coin a short, memorable term, then use both terms everywhere until your users have been around for a time. As a user gets more experienced on the site, drop the longer term and use the "jargon" term. It's a novel concept, it deserves a neologism.
Many things in mathematics are defined in a manner that is consistent and convenient. Defining 0! to be 1 is a similar case. In doing so nothing goes wrong, and the binomial theorem becomes simple and convenient to state. Without defining 0! as 1, it's a dreadful mish-mash of special cases.
Similarly with 0^0. Considering x^y where x and y are complex numbers, there is no consistent single value as x and y each approach 0. So in the reals and the complex numbers we leave 0^0 as undefined. However, in the case of natural numbers there is a case for declaring 0^0 to be 1. That's to make it convenient to talk about the set A^B as the collection of functions from B to A. When we do that we get |A^B| = |A|^|B|.
There is more than expected in mathematics that's defined for convenience.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8179473 3 points, 12 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8176770 3 points, 22 hours ago
> The Black Team link inside
> your link is broken ...
Fixed - thank you.There are more problems. Personally, I'd worry more about them than the indentation, but if code layout is your biggest problem, go for it.
But I can see how that nearly matches by description, so it would be a good match. Thanks.
> As of now I'm thinking that I'll never block my kid from
> looking at any kind of content. If she happens to come across
> some nudity or sex and she has questions about it I'll be open
> and honest and explain it.
There's some really, really nasty stuff out there. Really nasty stuff. Not just people having sex, but some brutal stuff that a medic friend of mine says gave him significant nightmares for some days.It's not just about nudity and sex. If it were I'd be less ambivalent. As it is I feel that you're being a bit naive.