578 karma · joined October 19, 2013
Z, y, x, w, v, u, t...
S, r, q, p, o, n, m...
L, k, j,
I, h, g,
F, e, d, c, b, and a.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citicorp_Center_engineering_cr...
"Who must comply with HIPAA": https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/190/who-must...
"Is a software vendor a business associate of a covered entity": https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/256/is-softw...
For example, the GoodRX [0] and BetterHelp [1] settlements were both due to alleged violations of the FTC Act and Health Breach Notification Rule, rather than a violation of HIPAA.
[0] https://www.hipaajournal.com/court-approves-ftc-settlement-g...
[1] https://www.hipaajournal.com/betterhelp-settlement-ftc-healt...
> The [median] student loan debt for a graduating undergrad is 23k. If college costs were truly 100k that just wouldn’t be the case.
I fail to see how that necessarily follows because:
- many students and families save for college, so there's a cash downpayment
- many students work to cover part of college costs
- many families work to cover part of college costs
But this seems an unproductive rabbit trail from the issue of letting kids get their sleep.
Does that include group selfies from the invite-only afterparty because it's "related" to a public event, or no because it's invite-only?
What about sharing location information related to a virtual public event? Or location information of an individual who's only virtually attending an in-person public event?
And more practically, what about live-documenting crimes, police brutality, war crimes...?
That having been said, you are not wrong. When we're talking about tarp-sized areas, any significant snowfall (i.e. anything not more quickly/easily cleared with a quick broom sweep) will get really heavy really quickly.
[0] There's a chart near the bottom of this page that describes types of snow/conditions, and lists imperial and metric measurements: https://roofonline.com/weights-measures/weight-of-snow/
As someone else with ADHD, I've found that one of the downfalls of "body doubling" is that it works both ways. Productivity can lead to more productivity because the body double can help me overcome the urge to research woodgas vehicles or the history of bread in Mesoamerica. But the double's lack of focus (e.g. being social, or forced meetings) destroys all focus because it's already enough of a task to manage my own executive functioning in a good environment.
The best balance I've found is remote work (so I am my only distraction), maybe with occasional in-person focused work sessions (à la hackathon), and occasional remote "body doubling" sessions with a friend or internet stranger.
TLDR: Solo remote work is better than attempting body doubling in an office environment, but remote "body doubling" is also occasionally helpful.
Yes, I have seen and heard plenty of people say CICO is simple and "all there is to it", often along with some "laws of physics" snip, as included in your previous comment.
> Are you seriously telling me your could gain weight when you just eat air?
That's a straw man if I've ever seen one.
Personally, when I reduce CI, my body responds by decreasing CO: I don't think as clearly (problematic for being a functional adult), and I'm even colder than normal. With no reasonable way to accurately measure the change in CO, it's difficult to balance the equation.
tldr: what's simple and obvious with spherical cows in a vacuum is not so simple in the real world
Isn't that to be expected, if you're using their cloud services? The point is that Garmin is (or was, I've had my watch for a few years) designed in such a way that the cloud services are not a requirement for full use of the device.
Yes, you can access the .FIT files directly via USB and then sync with other apps, such as TurtleSport, GPXsee, etc.
> What about the concern that the company is bought out in the future? Or that it may be sharing data already, with government agencies, etc? Or companies that it works with? > It boggles my mind, that people ... come to the judgement that its ok for corporations to have this personal data!
I'm not OP. I chose Garmin precisely because I don't think it's ok for corporations to have this personal data.
I chose Garmin because I can use it without needing to share any* of my data with a third party, including Garmin itself. I save the workout files to my computer via the same USB cable I use to charge the watch. There are various non-cloud apps I can use to view and analyze these workouts, if I actually cared to do so beyond the "fastest 5k" etc that the watch tracks automatically.
For this, it does not matter to me whether Garmin is bought out in the future because my watch works just fine as-is, and cannot update its OS without my explicit permission. I'm unsure what data Garmin would be capable of sharing because I have given it none.
* of course, speed/time/location data is obtained by pinging GPS/GLONASS satellites, but the watch can and does record my workouts quite accurately in non-GPS pedometer mode.
There is no soup kitchen here. There is one food bank, which is only open once a month for a couple of hours. I haven't been, so cannot say whether they attempt to provide a month's worth of food or not.
The last food bank I went to operated twice a week and attempted to provide a week's worth of calories in pre-sorted bags of goods. Recipients were limited to 2x/mo. Obtaining a larger bag (e.g. for a family) required providing official state-issued photo ID for any and all additional recipients, which was then logged and counted as part of each individual's 2x/mo limit.
Once net worth is that high, the majority of it seems to be attributable to stock market and other similarly intangible $, rather than $ someone has literally directly taken/earned from others. It seems unfair to expect humans to contemplate big numbers (something we're known to be bad at) by also thinking about imaginary $ as though they had a 1-for-1 tangible source.
That being said, you certainly aren't wrong to think of it this way. For example, Bezos' net worth of ~$110B / ~333M Americans = ~$333/American , which sounds like a reasonable ballpark approximation of how much _profit_ the average person has spent on Amazon + Audible + AWS + WaPo.
Thanks for giving examples of logical ways to process large numbers. These are good ways to double-check quick maths.
It doesn't seem to me that anyone was saying it was a guarantee. Rather, that being able to say "I'm out" is in something along the lines of the "necessary, but not sufficient" category.
HEPA filters don't filter NO2.