RunawayGalaxy

> If anything it’s the providers who are screwing over patients by gaming insurance and taking more than is necessary from the shared insurance pool of money.

If the 85% gets larger, so does the 15%. Both sides gain when the cost increases.

The title is far more general than what you actually mean. What's the reason for that if not click bait?

The concept of tolerance is most often used in the context of drugs, but it applies here too.

Does that go for Carta Marketplace also? Asking because it seems to be a separate business.

Do you have any evidence at all to this assertion?

Where are these people learning tailwind without learning css?

> ...it isn't an abstraction. It's a only a special syntax for applying predefined blocks of CSS to HTML elements.

How would you define abstraction then?

> especially likely, because he's talking about *defragging a hard drive*

Can someone explain why this is incorrect? I thought a hard drive is typically what one would defrag

It's crazy how much energy is spent trying to constrain free information flow.

Is the argument that because it's a shark, we should accept that and avoid feeding any contenders?

Was the shark perfect at its inception or did it adapt as all things do?

Doesn't its shark-ness come by virtue of surviving against the best efforts of challengers through time?

Isn't that continual evolution at least in part dependent on a continuum of challengers?

Don't we implicitly give up on searching for something that could potentially overtake the shark by dogmatically accepting the shark's shark-ness?

Free will is still a useful abstraction

It's all abstractions provided via interfaces, whether programmatic or graphical.

I think you missed the point about Japanese American internment.

What would a workflow look like with Figma?

Does anyone know if changing the display type of table elements (table, tr, td, etc.) to `block` or `flex` affect accessibility in any way? I would hope that the semantic structure of the tags would override changes on the styling level, but never been able to find a solid answer.

imho The primary value is their pared-down databases that mostly just work like you want them to.

OR maybe that's just how markets work

TBH this is reasonable. I'm not on the side of Apple, but the monopoly claim is ridiculous to me.

> It does when you literally can’t operate your store in another mall.

Android exists

> I also don’t think this analogy scales very well since many stores operate both in and out of closed shopping centers. Including Apple’s stores.

How is the scalability of the analogy relevant?

If I build a shopping center that gets tons of foot traffic, pay to build the amenities and security, and then charge stores rent, it doesn't suddenly become a monopoly when the tenants feel that the rent is too high.

They are the winners in a corrupt game, and it's easier to hate the player than the game.

Thanks for the share!

Rick Beato has some great videos on this subject

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXivZlPu0ms

To me that seems like three very different positions to be bucketed together?

It's more like fossil remains from the Mesozoic than litter.

Prove that your blockchain hasn't been compromised by a sophisticated 51% attack.

This started with the 3, which I returned for that reason, opting to stick with my Pixel 2 XL. I bought it at launch, and it still lasts me over a day with full charge.

It's not a design system. It's documentation/best practices around common UI components that you'd find in most design systems.

> The concept is very simple. A junior dev graduating from a bootcamp can create UI's, CRUD, etc. but should not be expected to have expertise in algorithms.

I find the idea that "you should expect less out of bootcamp grads" more harmful than helpful. The stigma of coming from a bootcamp is real in software, and this reinforces it. In my experience, there are certainly bootcamp grads out there who have strong algorithm skills.

To what end?