652 karma · joined December 4, 2018
I have not read the law myself, but if the summary is accurate, it seems to suggest police moving towards the bystander does not count.
- Regular expression lookbehind
- overscroll-behavior
- Web push
- SVG favicon
- Web Bluetooth (haven't run into this personally, but someone complained about this)
Say what you want but it is so frustrating when you run into problems like this. It does remind me of old IE days where we had to produce one gazillion hacks for IE.
> select audit.enable_tracking('public.members');
So you can actually have functions that have side effects in a select statement? I guess nothing prevents it, so it is allowed. But somehow I have the impression that select statements don't change anything.
Now I think about it, maybe we should have a blocklist that automatically removes results that invole this kind of deceptive behavior from search results.
Simply put: People use cryptocurrencies as speculative asset while they claim they are using them for decentralization and other properties.
If most (in my personal observation, 100%) use cases of such sector seems fraudulent, I do believe it is justified to generalize to the entire sector.
If you know what the author is referring to, can you link the relevant files so we can take a look at them?
EDIT: Also, if you don't know, Chrome also supports passwords export/import, so it not any more vendor-lock-in than any other password managers.
I have been using it for a couple years and haven't noticed any issue. Even if Google decides to screw me over and terminates my Google account, I can still access the passwords via the local copy in Chrome, so that is not really a concern.
(Though, don't take this as my recommendation to use Google' password manager. I have not done enough research in the password manager landscape, which is why I am asking this question in the first place.)
EDIT: also include other browsers' password managers. (It appears that it is a mistake to mention anything Google on HN :/)