On the other hand, this only applies to a limited set of workloads (training is often memory bandwidth bound for example).
I also wonder how this affects power consumption.
2,812 karma · joined June 13, 2012
On the other hand, this only applies to a limited set of workloads (training is often memory bandwidth bound for example).
I also wonder how this affects power consumption.
There's also more niche stuff like Flying Microtonal Banana.
Now, I personally have had two builds with LM. One with LM as the material for a CPU re-lid, and another for a direct-die application. Neither touched aluminum or untreated copper.
The re-lidded CPU is still going strong, no issues. But with the direct die application, I found the performance to significantly degrade after two years. Apparently there's a pump-out effect.
I ended up switching to PTM. Same temps as LM, but zero degradation so far.
There's also Halide, where you write the algo but the framework gets you the scheduling and SIMD.
I'm guessing that this is due to a lack of RL and data.
Accidentally making a machine learning system that happens to (potentially) do it is a different matter.
Fwiw I love K3 and use it as a daily driver. I haven't tried Sol, as I dislike OpenAI.
Somewhat unrelated criticism of Gmail - during the migration, I found out that there is no way to search for starred archived emails in Gmail. They don't show up in Starred, nor in any search with is:starred. Their star status also doesn't carry over when migrating.
I personally would like for it to pick up some ideas from Svelte.
Can't comment on how it compares to plans (I really don't like the limitations and general shenanigans I see around plans, so I've never tried them).
It is notably slower than Fable / Opus / Gemini, but also vastly cheaper than their API pricing.
Written on a OnePlus 8 Pro.