Sha1rholder

I absolutely agree that the opposite of "suffering".

Take a look at this reply.

This is an anger-driven Conversion: someone creates an account to respond out of intense disapproval of a certain opinion, which is extremely common on any forum.

- What do you mean "the right direction"? Do you mean the "open and free direction" that "Hey you can't have our Nvidia chips but must keep selling us cheap rare earth"? - And who are "we"? I suggest "we"'d better take care of "ourselves" instead of "react".

Every software design pattern came from elegant code. People wrote code, summarize code, learnt from code, and taught code. That's discovery

And we do talk about it often.

This “childhood song” example is completely out of step with China’s social reality, just as you can easily recognize at a glance “an old British poem” forged by an American.

At its core, it is a kind of projection along the lines of: “I’m an enlightened, worldly Western person who is almost immune to propaganda, and Chinese people are a mixed bag, but overall they are xxx.”

This is not the social reality in China. As the author’s background indicates, this is the imagining of an American who moved to the States at the age of four and has some interest in China due to ancestry.

Just to give one example—because there isn’t enough space here, and I can’t be bothered to write out more:

> Here is the first verse of a popular children’s song: ...

And yet, in more than twenty years of my life interacting with people of different ages from all over China, I have never once heard of this supposedly “popular children’s song.”

After all this article is just another BS about “It is concerning how much China blablabla...” Actually, on _Social Reality in_ Chinese American is they consider those “Chinese Chinese” as basically gorillas, parading them in front of other European Americans as if to say: “Look, these Chinese Chinese are my ancestors! Let’s study them together—and just look at how much further we Chinese Americans have evolved compared with them.” It IS a fancy imagination for those who really don't know zero about what's the reality of the people in the GFW.

Accounts ARE expensive.

I don't like it though.

> "Our model is extremely safe though it broke our sandbox and hacked foo bar... But you can't use our model for Cybersecurity (i don't care whether you're team blue) without our permissions or we'll ban you. And open-weight models are so dangerous let's ban them."

That's what AI companies that "focus on safety" did.

Source: dream?

I'm not sure that anyone will mind running production workloads against an API that bills half as much for a chunk of the day.