It certainly can, at least if you intend to exchange it for tangible goods or services, or if you convert it to a government currency. Why do you think these sorts of transactions cannot be regulated?
3,508 karma · joined May 18, 2013
It certainly can, at least if you intend to exchange it for tangible goods or services, or if you convert it to a government currency. Why do you think these sorts of transactions cannot be regulated?
I don't think that is an indictment of Linux. It is likely if the specs for the M1 were released, Linux could wring more performance out of the M1 than MacOS. At least in some workloads.
Perhaps, but with what hardware? The PC era was defined by mostly open hardware that had a high degree of interoperability. ARM does not bring the same.
That's a catch-22. You have to be pretty big to be able to license this stuff at all.
I would pay for this now if as a result google started respecting privacy.
Surely decriminalization is an improvement.
$(rev <<<gerg)
Citation needed. If you look at app store pricing models the opposite seems true. If I were going to take a random guess I would say that tech savvy users use open source software to avoid anti-consumer bullshit more than anything else.
ARM wants to be appropriate for more workloads. They don't want to have to wait for software to change. The want to sell processor designs now.