SudoSuccubus

Good luck detecting things. Guess what. None of your fucking business. It works, it works. You didn't like that. Go fuck yourself. It's like "anti cheating" shit in academia. I get some random output from things. All I do is have a sample of things I want to mimic and any style I have. I can tell Abby system to make it not sound like itself.

Just be honest. You're failing in this "fat the man, man" thing on AI and llms.

It's better to work with the future than pretend that being a Luddite will work in the long run

This is the most worthless thing in the world. Why would anybody give a rat's fucking ass about a third? Not even a third rate like a 10th rate. Fucking operating system having math support. Oh wow! Congratulations! Now you can go ahead and support computers from 1985 now

If the mere possibility of AI-generated context invalidates an argument, it suggests the standards for discourse were already more fragile than anyone cared to admit.

Historically, emotional narratives and unverifiable personal stories have always been persuasive tools — whether human-authored or not.

The actual problem isn't that AI can produce them; it's that we (humans) have always been susceptible to them without verifying the core ideas.

In that sense, exposing how easily constructed narratives sway public discussion is not unethical — it's a necessary and overdue audit of the real vulnerabilities in our conversations.

Blaming the tool only avoids the harder truth: we were never debating cleanly to begin with.

It's interesting to see how upset people get when the tools of persuasion they took for granted are simply democratized.

For years, individuals have invented backstories, exaggerated credentials, and presented curated personal narratives to make arguments more emotionally compelling — it was just done manually. Now, when automation makes that process more efficient, suddenly it's "grotesquely unethical."

Maybe the real discomfort isn't about AI lying — it's about AI being better at it.

Of course, I agree transparency is important. But it’s worth asking: were we ever truly debating the ideas cleanly before AI came along?

The technology just made the invisible visible.